Thread regarding Verizon Communications Inc. layoffs

Can Dan read this, as he wanted to listen from us this morning!!!!!

Dan, this message is for you.

Restructuring is a strategic necessity, but the way it was executed has exposed a serious problem inside the organization. Many leaders protected low performers simply because they were friends or favorites, while top talent — the people who carried teams, drove results, and supported customers — were the ones eliminated.

We saw the same pattern during the last VSP: some of the strongest minds and most committed employees walked out the door. It’s happening again, and the impact is real. When the people who actually make the company successful are gone, the company doesn’t get stronger — it gets weaker.

Verizon cannot grow if it keeps losing its best people while keeping those who contribute the least. Our customers feel it, our teams feel it, and the culture feels it. Favoritism is not leadership, and it’s not how you build a high-performance organization.

If we want to restore trust, retain talent, and win in the market, we need accountability for how these decisions were made. And we need to start investing in and protecting the hardworking employees who truly move this company forward.


by
| 2702 views | | 16 replies (last December 13) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kc61pz22

16 replies (most recent on top)

More people who think verizon can’t survive without them…they are the real problem:)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jb+1kc61pz22

Be like Dan the man, and drink more coffee and slurp loud. Then go ride a mechanical bull.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gc+1kc61pz22

I called Dan, but it went to VM. If I hear back, I'll report back.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cg+1kc61pz22

@b9 Dan, you have already failed and don't even know it. Verizon is going to continue to lose customers, because you and Verizon have shown you do not care about them. This is just another money grab. Good luck andremember carma is a bi--h.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cf+1kc61pz22

Dan

If your team told you that in a few chaotic weeks they got rid of the 1/4 of the non-union workforce who were not prepared to move the company forward, and kept those who were, they weren't being honest with you. And if you think a surgical task like that was possible in such a short time and under this stress, you are wrong. It might workout in the end, but that's not why. It will work out because those great ideas your direct reports have (but for some reason not yet implemented) actually work.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bx+1kc61pz22

@b9 simply wrong. The manner by who made the RIF decisions is who within the line of hierarchy, immediate supervisor known as the AD or a level higher or two levels higher? There is absolutely no transparency!! The selections made are full of biases!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bt+1kc61pz22

If you think your direct manager had any say in who left (at almost all levels) you really dont understand what the he-l is going on.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bh+1kc61pz22

Verizon’s core competency is nonstop reorgs and failed transformations over years and years. This has produced a culture of lazy grifters that have survived with high pay, tons of benefits and little to no productivity. By the time anyone starts to question them, another reorg distracts. The only difference with this latest is the ceo is honest about the failure instead of buying celeb friends and doing cringe vteamer day to gloss over the ongoing market share decline. But the nonstop reorgs will remain and continue with the same result.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bf+1kc61pz22

@b9 Let time decide this. The truth is coming from deep inside, but you’re masking it with the “big picture.” Have a life, bro. If you can’t investigate the real issues that are rotting this company, then stay where you are — and hopefully you’ll be next in a layoff round so you finally understand what unfairness and favoritism feel like. Fake Dan!!!!

By the way VZ stock is back in the gutter!!!! Check the stats…..

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @be+1kc61pz22

They didn't keep favorites or friends. They kept the people who help them continue to falsify the metrics, so everyone appears to be making improvements and gets max bonus. Zero sh--s given about the company or customer.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bc+1kc61pz22

A fish rots from the head

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b5+1kc61pz22

@a4 Ok now I understand why this id--t guy in the nordics got promoted ... family off course... Indian Punjabi frends..... f.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @av+1kc61pz22

@a2 i want too but i dont know if that will hurt the severance.

I dont want to go back…..but I want future hard working folks not to be part of this cruelty and unfairness, what most of us suffered in this round. Can i send him this and still be anonymous?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1kc61pz22

@a3 why do we have weak leaders in these positions in the 1st place? Why, as because due to the good old boy network. Promoting from within and nepotism being as has been done with so many Indians being promoted.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1kc61pz22

@OP: much needed as professed. Weak leaders keep weak performers and eliminate the threats by removing excelling performers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1kc61pz22

You should email this directly to Hatchet Man. Don’t use Slack

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1kc61pz22

Post a reply

: