Thread regarding General Motors layoffs

Changing the narrative: Managers produce nothing and are obsolete in the AI era

Let's flip the narrative that AI will replace workers on its head: What if it's the managers themselves who are the ones to be replaced by AI?

In the auto industry, AI is showing its power by analyzing data faster than us, helping us communicate better, solving problems quicker, and even managing resources and training. This means AI could change the way managers work, possibly replacing them with a smarter, more efficient system. Don't let them demoralize us with threats. Flip it on it's head by discussing this idea that managers don't even produce anything. They are essentially organizers of work that are obsolete in the AI age!

Do you have any ideas on how this can be done and how we can flip the script?

Here's one that will get their attention: Propose to upper management AI agents in Glean that can effectively manage workflow, training information, automated emails regarding dates, events and even safety messages. They can easily get rid of two layers of management with this.


by
| 193 views | | 17 replies (last 5 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1m3f7t4a6

17 replies (most recent on top)

Put it this way, I would not be putting on my DinkedIn "20 yrs of managerial experience" or anything like that. At all.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @67n+1m3f7t4a6

@3aj How many projects have you seen run aground at GM with no real penalty assessed to anyone? Up to, and including, the bankruptcy. Quarterly stock performance is everything. It su-ks, but that's the reality.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3cp+1m3f7t4a6

@2a6 Middle managers are very useful to upper managers. Upper management use middle management to insulate themselves from a lot of issues. That's far more useful than an implementation of the latest tech. That's what I was trying to say. Others have said it more succinctly than I have in this topic.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ch+1m3f7t4a6

@3aj
The AI tech Bros that were running around saying that human office workers would be replaced by a year or so were telling a huge self-serving lie, which was gleefully repeated through the media. The boardroom executives were wetting themselves thinking about the insane labor cost they would cut. They fell for the lie.
If you do a cost analysis/comparison between self-hosting open models and renting AI compute, the AI compute is still cheaper. But how many of these executives are going to think that it's another get out of jail free card? They are in so far over their heads. Who will ever hold them accountable? I believe it will be investors and customers. And it won't be pretty.
After the fallout when these companies are hiring with a great sense of urgency, if you are desperate enough to find yourself coming back for more, you will have to adjust your expectations and attitude accordingly.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3c9+1m3f7t4a6

All the CEOs who are laying off employees because AI can do everyone's jobs for half the price are going to be shocked when there are no more subsidies and they have to pay full cost, which is like 5 times the cost of hiring a person.

The CEOs evil plans will be foiled.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3aj+1m3f7t4a6

Ai companies are spending huge amounts of money on data centers and subsidizing their customers, because if people had to pay the full cost no one would use AI.

I don't think any AI company is actually profitable, and you can't lose money forever.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ah+1m3f7t4a6

The AI bubble is bursting and it's going to bring the entire global economy down with it. It's three times bigger than the .com bubble. It feels like the last 6 years have been all leading to this big moment. I hope no one says, "no one saw this coming."
It doesn't take a genius to see that we won't be selling too many new cars in the near future.
The most tragic thing is that 401ks and pensions are going to get wiped out.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3af+1m3f7t4a6

@2pt
Managers aren't protecting managers out of kindness or some kind of loyalty. They are protecting other managers because the people beneath them are carrying their water. That's it. But when the upper manager is decide that the middle managers are expired milk, they won't hesitate to use technology like AI to wipe them out.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2yv+1m3f7t4a6

Managers protect managers.

If they get laid off at all, that group takes a much smaller hit by percentage than worker bees.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2pt+1m3f7t4a6

@1bt
Can you explain yourself better?
Are you saying that we can't get rid of managers because they outsource?
If so, you do realize that every manager has a manager going up the chain?
There are levels of management on the lower rung that are completely unnecessary. The upper managers know this.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2a6+1m3f7t4a6

@10e "We outsource everything else, why not outsource management too?" Because management are the ones who control outsourcing. Nothing happens but what management makes happen, for better or worse.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bt+1m3f7t4a6

Will the AI manager only hire Indians if we name it Raj?
"agent_raj"

We need to make sure that GM maintains it's diversity.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @162+1m3f7t4a6

@108
Upper managers also have budgets and also need to demonstrate cost cutting.
In fact, I suspect that the pressure for cost cutting is even more intense for these people. It would would be a matter of hiring consultants who could deploy the AI software. The consultants could hire contractors to do the testing. None of this is complicated. All of it is feasible.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @10e+1m3f7t4a6

Managers control subscription budget to AI services. The human fiefdom will continue.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @108+1m3f7t4a6

You are the expert on obsolete

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gh+1m3f7t4a6

How does AI look in a leather jacket?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @f9+1m3f7t4a6

Can AI do fireside chats and throw pizza parties?
Can AI rock a pantsuit and can it have an entourage of *** kissers?

I don’t think so!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e2+1m3f7t4a6

Post a reply

: