Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

WFB WFH Policy

Is it true that we'll not be allowed to work from home any more?

by
| 3578 views | | 13 replies (last July 15, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+ZWMAVBv

13 replies (most recent on top)

If the new CTO of Wells Fargo intends to personally review telecommuting requests, then this is the least of the problems of folks who work in EIT because that is an extraordinary degree of micromanagement. It means that he thinks managers cannot be trusted, and instead of encouraging a high performance team that can be trusted to do their job, and removing actual non-performers, he is choosing micromanagement. Probably not an awesome sign of the future and more likely to chase off high performers with other options than bottom tier folks.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7thv+ZWMAVBv

Sahl told me wfh would be limited to 3/5 days unless you have an exception for medical or a situation with a child for example, but that would be reviewed at his level. Employees would have to work in the office and badge in/out Reports (just daily...aka did you come in at all) aero being sent up the chain.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7caf+ZWMAVBv

What are the hub locations?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cvl+ZWMAVBv

Word on the street it’s back to DC and Hub locations by 2022. Gives them a few years to move people around and hope that more quit. Again just rumor mill

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1idc+ZWMAVBv

Cut telecommuting = cheap way to attrite people.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wcb+ZWMAVBv

Geezus people wake up. It’s the pendulum swinging in one direction, which will make sense for some areas but not others. Consolidating workers into hubs makes sense for some teams, but for others it will not be practical.

For anyone that’s been around for a while, you’ve seen the emphasis on remote vs in office go back and forth. Why would this be any different?

Senior leaders need to send the right signal to shareholders (only people that really matter) that streamlining is taking place, and for some groups this will make sense. If you have 10 people on a team and most are near hubs but work remotely for convenience, yeah, that’s gonna change. Things like RPA for back office functions and branch closings will make up the majority of “organic” staff reduction anyways, that’s clearly the big picture. Figure 15 employees per branch, multiplied by the 800 branches planned to be closed by 2020, that’s 12,000. Or almost half of the 10% of the total workforce on the potential chopping block.

Think about your individual job, how it adds value to the org (or doesn’t), particularly as it relates to MRAs and things related, and form your own opinion about what may happen.

Best wishes to all my fellow TMs, but as we all learn more in the coming weeks and months, please don’t let random Internet posts be the

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1shd+ZWMAVBv

Could someone please enlighten the poster who thinks TECHNOLOGY Town Halls have no news that impacts the overall enterprise?

Saul is overseeing EVERYTHING related to tech, including remote access.

Wake up!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pnv+ZWMAVBv

@ZWMAVBv-jgs

The title of the meeting is "Wells Fargo TECHNOLOGY Town Hall..."

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nci+ZWMAVBv

Reduce risk my a**... has nothing whatsoever to do with risk reduction. Large portion of our EIS workforce is telecommute, including many of our senior info sec leaders.

Yeah, real risk with having them telecommute.

WTF is it with some banks and this aversion to telecommuting.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @apf+ZWMAVBv

Is Saul’s meeting company wide?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jgs+ZWMAVBv

We're told this same thing, there's a meeting on the 17th with Saul where we believe he'll announce his plans.

Until then, anything on this site is probably speculation, so be wary.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jnx+ZWMAVBv

My team got word today and were told new IT guy wants to do so across the enterprise to reduce risk.

If you haven't been told yet, we were told it's only a matter of time.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @orl+ZWMAVBv

No

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dfz+ZWMAVBv

Post a reply

: