Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

Does AT&T Even Need DirecTV? If the pay-TV unit continues causing headaches for shareholders and bondholders, selling it may not be crazy

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-01-15/directv-sale-offers-at-t-extreme-option-to-pay-down-debt?srnd=premium

by
| 1178 views | | 9 replies (last January 16, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+X8IGWZh

9 replies (most recent on top)

AT&T has done so much damage to Direct TV, their formerly great customer service, and employee morale that they would never get back the premium they paid for Direct TV.

A much more productive idea would be to get rid of Randall. And throw his a-- out the plane without his golden parachute too.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pyk+X8IGWZh

I think they need it, because much of their internet offering is on copper. Moving the TV from Uverse TV to Direct TV frees up bandwidth on their internet connections.

Also, Direct TV could be part of a nation-wide triple play, with 5G internet, cell phone, and the other piece, TV. Of course, the TV could come over the 5G internet - but right now, wireless internet is constrained by data caps.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jxx+X8IGWZh

AT&T Is A Big, Steaming Heap Of Failure

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jwn+X8IGWZh

“It was clear from the beginning that DirecTV was a bad transaction, “hey were buying an asset at an absurdly high price at what almost everybody understood to be its absolute peak. There was nowhere for DirecTV to go but down. Now they’re paying the price for an ill-advised DirecTV transaction.”, I knew this years ago, and I am not a financial analyst. LOL

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bot+X8IGWZh

As long as they are selling entertainment tv, they will keep Directv. That business includes all the content carry contracts for content they deliver, regardless of the dwindling subscriber base in the satellite business. Those contracts are probably the biggest asset the company owns.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ltx+X8IGWZh

Quote from the article: "Of course, there are caveats to the idea of AT&T getting rid of DirecTV. For starters, it’s likely worth less now than what AT&T paid for it."

Shocking!

Everything ATT touches loses value because of mismanagement, inadequaate investment, and excessive cost cutting (to compensate for mismanagement and inadequate investment).

What Wall Street and financial press observers don't really get is how toxic and disfunctional ATT realy is. You have to work here to really appreciate that.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bgh+X8IGWZh

If this comes to pass, the board needs to take a long, hard look at Randall and ask him to step down.

What was the point of it all?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xjf+X8IGWZh

Now that they ruined Directv, and screwed up the lives of many of their workers, sure why not.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pwa+X8IGWZh

Most of us at DIRECTV would welcome this with open arms. Anything to distance ourselves from the rancid and trashy AT&T culture, with its surplus mentality and mouthbreathing workforce.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vxh+X8IGWZh

Post a reply

: