Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

Waiver Invalid in Discrimination Suit Against AT&T

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/waiver-invalid-discrimination-suit-against-013455012.html

by
| 1512 views | | 4 replies (last January 15, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+X7VY7fX

4 replies (most recent on top)

Daniel Orlow of Console Mattiacci in Philadelphia has been added to my contacts ;)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1upf+X7VY7fX

I also signed last year can anyone confirm ADEA Listing was the same in regards to PDF provided by #bpy ?? If so would like to join lawsuit. Was informed job was being eliminated and only employee in market with same job title. My age 55

Below taken from PDF at below link. THANK YOU!!

Above the table, the ADEA Listing read as follows:

Affected Work Groups (AWG) are comprised of positions at the same level with similar definable characteristics from which the surplus employees are selected. . . . The combined AWGs comprise the Decisional Unit for this business case.

Id. (emphasis in original).4

4

Ray claims that the headings “AWG” and “IIL” were not clearly defined or explained by the ADEA Listing. Pl. SOF ¶¶ 29-30. However, the ADEA Listing clearly and unambiguously contains the above-quoted language, along with a similarly clear elaboration on the term “IIL,”

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qfl+X7VY7fX

It is my understanding that after this lawsuit was filed the WAIVER WAS REVISED/AMENDED NOVEMBER 2017. Amended date also on revised waiver. I was surplussed last year and off payroll in October. ADEA list was provided. Attorney advised I sign for severance due to revision???

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bpy+X7VY7fX

https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/documents/402/33918/Ray-v-ATT.pdf

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @myy+X7VY7fX

Post a reply

: