Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

The big players are turning streaming into a negative-margin business

As well, AT&T has to finance its dubious, late-to-the-game plan to launch a WarnerMedia streaming service and its plan to massively bulk up HBO programming. The closures won’t free up much, but hey, every million dollars saved counts for something, right?

But whatever savings the lumbering phone company extracts, it also is demonstrating the numbing downside of corporate gigantism: a downsizing of entertainment options.

Mostly it’ll just be late to the game, trying to catch up with Netflix, Apple, Disney, Hulu, Facebook, Google and so many others, as well as all those small fry out there still providing interesting programming for a clearly defined audience.

One promise of the streaming revolution was access to a vast shelf of content, some of which was sure to appeal to you. Unsurprisingly, when a large and ancient, highly regulated utility takes over an entertainment company with a number of quirky little units in various corners, it has no idea what to do with those.

We’re all the poorer for it.

And with some headwinds starting to hit the economy (higher interest rates, a suddenly sullen stock market, a China trade war), I don’t think this is going to get better soon. Are these closures an early indicator of some larger reckoning for, especially, smaller digital services?

More consolidation is inevitable. Rich Hull, CEO of the streaming service Pongalo, told me he fully expects a consolidation over the next couple of years in Spanish-language content sector where Pongalo operates.

And at this month’s NAB NY conference, Sinclair Broadcast Group CEO Christopher Shipley called the streaming-video sector “a sea of blood” because big companies are turning it into “a negative-margin business.”

That means, if you’re Amazon, Apple, Facebook or Google (and probably AT&T and Comcast), you can lose money on billions of dollars worth of original content, as long that brings in more customers buy phones or phone service, or a bunch of other stuff, or pay for a fast internet connection and other services.

But building more giant services, as all the big boys are doing, isn’t leaving much room for the interesting, quirky, innovative units like FilmStruck, DramaFever, and Super Deluxe. Can’t we get more out endless choice than this? Can’t we get some vision and voice? A man can dream, even if AT&T can’t.

Bumped this from another thread. OP by @VSk37po-1anj

by
| 943 views | | 3 replies (last November 2, 2018) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+VVjxArN

3 replies (most recent on top)

Who want to pay for shows when content is free in many ways, my generation don't pay for it, You don't need HBO to watch "Game Of Thrones." All you need to watch the most pirated show ever, or almost anything, is either to download it from a torrent site or to Google "Game of Thrones streaming" and click one of the first links that comes up to watch it online.

Now, don't take that as an endorsement. These activities, especially streaming, can be illegal; risk exposure to , pop-up ads, and other annoyances. But you need to learn and evolve.

"It's too complicated for most OLD people," and obviously for Randall and his associates Dinosaurs, Millennial are not as dumb as many people think, we can really save money, after all we were raised during the last down cycle.

you should try it, and don't pay for substandard and expensive streaming services, specially form our best friend AT&T

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xzu+VVjxArN

T always spending billions of dollars, here, there, etc all over the news.

But the company still gets about 80% of its revenue from traditional telecom services, and most of the outside plant is sh--.

AT&T survives thanks to PR campaigns of projects that do not exist.

...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @szw+VVjxArN

They did not see this coming, not even the disruptor, Laughing my assoff!

I Have a the content I want for free, in the www.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gjn+VVjxArN

Post a reply

: