Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Car Dealer Services Doing Layoffs Because They Were Committing Fraud Too

In the last five years WF Consumer Lending (Car Dealer Services) has been opening up auto insurance policies as part of customers' auto loans without their knowledge or consent. Nearly 600,000 customers had these fake policies created and 20,000 had to default on their loans because the insurance policies were so expensive and unnecessary and redundant to their existing auto policies.

http://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-fi-wells-fargo-insurance-20170728-story.html

Wells Fargo & Co. says that it charged hundreds of thousands of auto loan customers for insurance they did not ask for or need — in some cases causing those customers’ cars to be repossessed — and that it’s taking steps now to try to make things right.

After reviewing records from 2012 through 2017, Wells Fargo identified about 570,000 customers who may have been wrongly pushed into these insurance policies and will give them “refunds and other payments as compensation,” the San Francisco bank said in a news release late Thursday.

Wells Fargo made its announcement shortly after the New York Times published an article, based on a report commissioned by the bank, that first reported the problem and said more than 800,000 customers may have been affected.

That report was prepared months ago by a consulting firm at the bank’s request. The bank continued its internal review and concluded that a smaller number of customers were affected and would qualify for refunds.

The issue centers on collateral protection insurance policies, which are similar to auto insurance policies commonly taken out by vehicle owners to cover costs of damage to their own vehicles. Wells Fargo and other lenders often require that auto-loan customers have such policies, and if the customers can’t prove they do, the lenders often will buy a policy on their behalf and pass along the cost.

In this case, though, Wells Fargo improperly bought such policies on behalf of customers who already had their own insurance, and sometimes failed to properly notify those customers that it was doing so.

“We take full responsibility for our failure to appropriately manage the [insurance] program and are extremely sorry for any harm this caused our customers, who expect and deserve better from us,” Franklin Codel, head of Wells Fargo Consumer Lending, said in a statement. “Upon our discovery, we acted swiftly to discontinue the program and immediately develop a plan to make impacted customers whole.”

The company estimated that $64 million of cash remediation will be sent to customers, along with $16 million in account adjustments. It said it will also work to correct customers’ credit records.

Wells Fargo was already attempting to regain the public’s trust after a scandal over unauthorized accounts. In that scandal, Wells Fargo employees — trying to meet onerous sales quotas set by managers and executives — created as many as 3.5 million checking, savings and other accounts in customers’ names without those customers’ knowledge or consent. The bank’s practices were first uncovered by a 2013 Los Angeles Times investigation.

It’s also dealing with fallout from a lawsuit filed this month alleging that the bank hit customers with fees for delays in processing mortgage applications.

Wells Fargo said it began a review of the insurance policies in July of last year and stopped issuing such policies in September. It estimated that the process of paying back customers will be complete by the end of this year.

by
| 1582 views | | 5 replies (last July 31, 2017) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+OuAJOhG

5 replies (most recent on top)

After a discovery by attorney as there is already a class action lawsuit for auto insurance fraud it will likely be more than a million customers in the last decade 2001 to 2010 that had this happen to. There will be a fine from the CFPB and more lawyers costs, and the total costs will be in the 9 figures to resolve.

Remember when the living will was approved in April of 2017 this issue was not brought up regarding their governance. Which means that WF never had governance controls in place.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3kvo+OuAJOhG

Lets add that those effected get $65.00. Those effected where due to their state should have had disclosure but did not, $80.00 Those that got their car repo'd as a result of this, they get $800.00. Payments it said will start in August. Isn't those numbers just a bit off to you too? Why so little when the CPI insurance was I am sure more than that per month? I don't know. Im so tired of the constant finding out of something else Wells does it is very disheartening. Surely it is sullying the employee's reputation to get a job at another bank. I think it would effect the decision to hire somebody from WF. How would they know it isn't an employee that did something like this or the mismanagement of the customer information given to an attorney on a disc, or the numerous other infractions that have happened? What is next?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3szy+OuAJOhG

So it seems it's not just one division but community banking, wholesale, and consumer lending are all doing illegal things. The entire executive team reporting to and including Tim Sloan should be fired, and the entire board fired too.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @box+OuAJOhG

They would find out when their cars were repossessed and dug through the fine print of their policies. Complaints to have it rectified were sandbagged and required each customer to go through individual arbitration against WF lawyers so the public at large didnt know what was going on because once a customer signs a contract even fraudulent accounts have to be arrested, same as the rest of the accounts.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vte+OuAJOhG

So how would a customer know if it affected them if the policies were opened without their knowledge or consent?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @woe+OuAJOhG

Post a reply

: