Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

It is time to Panic

More commonly, the big buyouts are merely attempts to buy time. Integrating incompatible operations for a couple of years, and providing excuses for large-scale layoffs. The smoke and mirrors works only for so long. Then another expensive deal is required to keep the ruse going.

The DirecTV deal is looking like it will fall into the latter camp-an expensive gambit that may at best offer growth and cost-savings in the short-term. Pay-TV has an uncertain future in an era where over-the-top offerings like Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and video consumption on mobile devices are seeing much stronger growth.

by
| 1944 views | | 7 replies (last April 30, 2017) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+N0UZGIf

7 replies (most recent on top)

AT T stock yielded more than 5% for much of the year. Compared to bonds and CDs, that looked great. And while AT their protests won’t amount to much. AT&T is left with the weakest network, wide gaps in coverage, and slow service, while up against a monopolistic market leader and a fairly strong No. 2 player.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ezd+N0UZGIf

Bye bye well paid technicians, bring in the cheap replacements anyone can do their job

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2drw+N0UZGIf

Funny comment, There is no money, it is all all subsided by stock holders in a way, after the TW merger gets approved, T will be the company with the highest Debt on earth, and by the way ... no ones wants POTS, or T.-1's anymore, as far as oTTservices no one knows, but T paid almost 50 B , i do jot see them making money, go back to sleep old timer

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1byl+N0UZGIf

Time to panic? sure, if you install landline telephone service or T1's. Your other observations show your complete lack of understanding of pay TV and OTT services. Where do you think the money for big buyouts comes from? I bet you thoughtthe same thing when the telco's were implement wireless service in the 80's and 90's. Wireless drives a company like AT&T now.

Too big? Too big for what?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xzz+N0UZGIf

AT&T has once again become too big. They should've never been allowed to become one again (even though on paper they're still operating under the legacy names).

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ieu+N0UZGIf

So you are calling AT&T a rollup?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kfj+N0UZGIf

Thanks, chicken little.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tuh+N0UZGIf

Post a reply

: