Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

As layoffs near, AT&T try to appeal to millennials

Denoting a departure from the amiability and tender loving care that most associate with AT&T, the friendly little telecommunications conglomerate is toughening up for 2017, hiring Mark Wahlberg to be the new, perpetually exasperated face of its advertising. The company announced that the actor will begin appearing in AT&T commercials this April in which he’ll remind customers that the service allows you take your entertainment along to whatever queer stuff you might be doing. What, you think it doesn’t? Do you need Mark Wahlberg to come over there and show you, Chief? Maybe take a nice, up-close look at your phone, so you can see how AT&T delivers all your live channels and DVR—right in your face.

The terms of the deal were not disclosed, though The New York Post reports that the contract could be valued at more than $10 million, a small price to pay for what AT&T’s chief marketing officer Brad Bentley believes is the perfect match of product and pitchman. “There’s no one more authentic to show how AT&T does entertainment your way, than Mark Wahlberg—a no-nonsense entertainer himself,” Bentley said in a statement, differentiating Wahlberg from all those other celebrities out here promoting phones, like Verizon’s Jamie Foxx and Ricky Gervais, or T-Mobile’s Justin Bieber, who won’t cut the sh-- and tell you straight out that you’re buying AT&T or you can get f---ed. Even if Mark Wahlberg has to come down there and demonstrate to you personally that AT&T gives you the premium entertainment you want across all your screens, even if he has to bust a few of those screens across your head, then he will. And then he will ask for your forgiveness.

Wahlberg’s deal follows other multiyear contracts AT&T signed with Reese Witherspoon and Taylor Swift, and it similarly includes a plan to create original content for its mobile network, ensuring you never need go anywhere without Mark Wahlberg again. He’s going to be right there in your f---ing pocket, smart-a--, and if you’ve got a problem with it, then you just call customer service and let’s see how that works out for you.

by
| 1768 views | | 9 replies (last March 27, 2017) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+MjBC648

9 replies (most recent on top)

I don't think the majority of US residents value the opinions of celebrities in telling us what to think, and many celebrity products are actively boycotted. Then again, many people don't watch ad based TV anymore. The do you hear me now guy and that ad states pretty much the truth regarding network coverage LOL.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cafd+MjBC648

I just wanted to say I actually did laugh out loud at this post. Well done!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ngs+MjBC648

I wonder how many employees use another carrier? The employee discount is piddly.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yvh+MjBC648

But, but, but AT&T has Taylor Swift and Marky Mark promoting the network so it must be good, right?? Nope. Word of mouth is still valuable. Very valuable. A conversation between real people: " Hey my cell phone doesn't work all of the time where I live, who do you use?" I use "XYZ" and I have no problems. Oh, thanks. I'll look into to XYZ when my contract is up. (Customer defects to XYZ). A recommendation from one neighbor is worth something. The problem is that maintaining a quality network that people will recommend to their neighbors is more costly than running a advertising campaign to tell everyone how wonderful the network is. Guess where the capital dollars to upgrade the network get siphoned off to.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yom+MjBC648

Millennials can't care less, that explains who's making the decision.s. The dinosaurs

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bit+MjBC648

Good luck with that

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @spk+MjBC648

They can continue to blow as much cash as they want on Celebrities. No one with any cash or a good credit rating gives a F--K about what celebrity promotes a network. Those people have choices. The company wants YOUR business, not the other way around. When your network is good, it stands for itself, but if it is weak, bring out the paid jesters.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uil+MjBC648

Just the image T needs, but where is Wahlberg hiding his phone?

http://www.gettyimages.com/photos/marky-mark-underwear?excludenudity=true&sort=mostpopular&mediatype=photography&phrase=marky%20mark%20underwear

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @syk+MjBC648

I am not sure Marky-Mark makes up for poor service and coverage.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nni+MjBC648

Post a reply

: