Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

When will Cricket Indirect Sales Reps be cut.

Being that they just eliminated all ATT RAEs, how long until they do the same on the Cricket side?

by
| 3214 views | | 10 replies (last January 9, 2017) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+LelHPvZ

10 replies (most recent on top)

@LelHPvZ-2zzc sounds about right

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2wsg+LelHPvZ

@LelHPvZ-1sed not salty but honest.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2vxd+LelHPvZ

Salty = Millennial passive aggresive speak

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2zzc+LelHPvZ

LelHPvZ-1sed You sound really salty right now, I'm on the COR side and I wouldn't wish or hope that anyone on the cricket side gets surplussed

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2qum+LelHPvZ

There is one major difference between AT&T and Cricket Wireless.

A lot of consumers are looking for a cheaper and more affordable options. While the growth of AT&T has reached it's limit- Cricket Wireless is still growing.

$70 a month for completely unlimited and direct tv now for $35.00.

While the same package with AT&T would be almost double the price. The industry is changing- Only time will tell how Cricket Wireless employees will be effected.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2lea+LelHPvZ

Your days are numbered. Why would they need indirect support for Cricket but not AT&T stores when Cricket is way easier to support?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1sed+LelHPvZ

Just like it was mentioned previously by someone they can always revisit the surpluss for cricket as well no one stated that there would be anymore cuts on the cricket side.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ixh+LelHPvZ

Rae's had gone through their cuts too, back in June. Just because cricket made cuts recently doesn't mean they won't do it again.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ajx+LelHPvZ

Cricket has gone through it already but you never know if they will revisit that option there

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wvt+LelHPvZ

They stated Cricket has already gone through our layoffs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xwb+LelHPvZ

Post a reply

: