Thread regarding Verizon Communications Inc. layoffs

The Bern of reality?

Feeling The Bern of Reality -- The Facts About Verizon and The 'Moral Economy'

Apr 13, 2016

530,837 views

3,836 Likes

1,158 Comments

Share on LinkedInShare on FacebookShare on Twitter

I read with interest Jeff Immelt’s spirited response to Sen. Bernie Sanders putting GE on his hit-list of big corporations that are “destroying the moral fabric” of America.

In fact, I share his frustration. Verizon is in Sanders’s bull’s-eye, as well. The senator’s uninformed views are, in a word, contemptible. Here’s why.

His first accusation – that Verizon doesn’t pay its fair share of taxes – is just plain wrong. As our financial statements clearly show, we’ve paid more than $15.6 billion in taxes over the last two years – that’s a 35% tax rate in 2015, for anyone who’s counting. We’ve laid out the facts repeatedly and did so again yesterday (see “Sen. Sanders needs to get his facts straight” at Verizon.com/about/news). The senator has started to fudge his language – talking of taxes not paid in some unspecified “given year” – but that doesn’t make his contention any less false.

Sen. Sanders also claims that Verizon doesn’t use its profits to benefit America. Again, a look at the facts says otherwise. In the last two years, Verizon has invested some $35 billion in infrastructure -- virtually all of it in the U.S. -- and paid out more than $16 billion in dividends to the millions of average Americans who invest in our stock. In Sanders’s home state of Vermont alone, Verizon has invested more than $16 million in plant and equipment and pays close to $42 million a year to vendors and suppliers, many of them small and medium-sized businesses. Just yesterday, we announced a $300 million investment to bring fiber to the city of Boston, which will make it one of the most technologically advanced cities in the nation and expand broadband access for its residents. Boston’s Mayor Walsh is partnering with us on this initiative, calling it crucial for providing the foundation for future technology growth. We’re making significant investments in New York City, Philadelphia and other metro areas throughout our wireline footprint.

Verizon is one of the top 3 capital investors in all corporate America. Our investment has built wireless and fiber networks that deliver high-quality services, create high-tech jobs and form the infrastructure for the innovation economy of the 21st century.

I challenge Sen. Sanders to show me a company that’s done more to invest in America than Verizon.

Sen. Sanders has also involved himself in our on-going negotiations with the labor unions representing some 36,000 communications workers in our wireline business, a bargaining process that has been going on since last June. At a labor convention in Philadelphia last week, Sanders claimed that Verizon is demanding that workers take pay cuts and reduce health benefits or see their jobs shipped overseas.

Again, Sen. Sanders is wrong on the facts. More egregiously, he oversimplifies the complex forces operating in today’s technologically advanced and hyper-competitive economy.

Our objective in these negotiations is to preserve good jobs with competitive wages and excellent benefits while addressing the needs of our ever-changing business. All of our contract proposals currently on the table include wage increases, generous 401(k) matches and continued pension benefits. Contrary to Sen. Sanders’s contention, our proposals do not call for mass layoffs or shipping jobs overseas. Rather, we’ve asked for more flexibility in routing calls and consolidating some of our call centers, some of which employ a handful of people. We would continue to provide health insurance for active and retired associates and their dependents, but we have proposed some common-sense reforms to rein in the cost of these plans, which in 2015 ran to $1.4 billion a year for these represented employees, retirees and dependents. In fact, our healthcare plans – which provide access to medical, prescription drug, dental and vision coverage – are robust enough to make us subject to the “Cadillac tax” on excessive plans as defined in the Affordable Healthcare Act … the very law Sen. Sanders supported and voted for.

(If you want to read more details about our comprehensive proposal, go to Verizon.com/laborfacts.)

by
| 1136 views | | 5 replies (last December 6, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+KDtMbQ4

5 replies (most recent on top)

The end if this statement, that no layoffs will follow, is clearly wrong and dishonest. There have been many since April, especially the past two months. When the central tenant of his statement is false, it gets tough to stomach the rest. Employees afraid to speak against their own company, $25 million wasted on rock stars, this is shameful, especially a company that makes mistakes on customer bills but lacks employees to provide support during off hours. Someone is relishing the caviar tonight , and implying that you are serving the community by building your telecom infrastructure is really stretching it when the quality of product is foul. Normally a market would not support this, without internal manipulation and lack of loyalty to your own employees which we hear of again and again.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5jgs+KDtMbQ4

This. Post by Lowell McDumbass was posted on Linkedin during the first week of the strike. At that time, the post received over 45,000 negative responses, setting the tone for Verizon's total PR disaster.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ofw+KDtMbQ4

@OP, how is the weather in BASKING RIDGE, where you obviously work on the same floor as the God_Pods.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bll+KDtMbQ4

A read on Yahoo that Verizon placed FIOS in three towns where I work. Our group does the FIOS fiber splicing in the area mentioned, the claim was clearly false. At that moment I decided anything coming from this company could be false.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fug+KDtMbQ4

It sure would be a shame if our CEO said something some people found politically offensive and we ended up with a boycott of Verizon.

I understand Bernie Sanders was very popular with Millenials, a market that certain companies are supposedly interested in.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @phr+KDtMbQ4

Post a reply

: