In my area the people who were canned with severance was 75% female. Additionally, 90% of them had used STD or FML time.
I know the company is reducing overhead and making "decisions for business" but from what I am gathering they are eliminating people based on how difficult it is to term them under other circumstances: ie, attendence, performance, sales (doesnt apply), etc. Women are traditionally more expensive to hire than men, for example, because they use more benefits and time. Would everyone willing please post if there are any common denominators on your end?