Thread regarding AT&T Inc. layoffs

So long...

After 21 years working for this company which provided me with a good salary, a company car, laptop and mobile phone. All I had to do was work 7 days a week, 10 hours a day, as long as I created " revenue" & "good ‘numbers", nothing could happen to me.

To make a long story short, I wasn’t useful for the company anymore (although my group gained profits month after month) so I got kicked out of the company in a very bad way.

The multi product.layer initiatives, serve a purpose, The failure of U-verse was by design, 45% OSP/conditioning did not meet the criteria,but signed off by engineering due to pressure from senior leadership, they asserted this position in various press releases insisting that those limitations would be be solved by the DTV merger, Senior leadership argued, wrong again

From that time on I promised myself never to give a huge part of my time to a company that doesn’t give a sh-- about anyone, only themselves, to make lots of money, and to be in total control of what went right and wrong.

I was also part of the executive AT&T group to bring fiber-to-the-home to an additional 2 million customers, but to date it's still not clear exactly how many locations would get AT&T's fiber in the absence of the merger with DTV, The press and public aren't the only ones being conned, this company has consistently used its phantom fiber deployment as a carrot on a stick with regulators, at one point threatening to stop making these investments unless regulators walked back net neutrality, wrong again

AT&T backed off the claim when the FCC asked for hard data, but this kind of telecom theater works exceptionally well in state legislatures. Often AT&T claimed net neutrality prevented them from innovating, and this week they're portraying themselves as the innovator of the century (even though the only actual innovation here is in misleading PR. A House of Cards indeed.

by
| 1332 views | | 4 replies (last July 24, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+IvQIp8a

4 replies (most recent on top)

Just a matter of time for the Deathstar to Blow up!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2dym+IvQIp8a

Previous post on target, DTV, is a dying and outdated patform, U-verse is on life support, no wireless growth, ATT version of Netflix,/company numb, and there is The MX deal, Three years after Mexican regulators tightened their grip on Carlos Slim, the government is showing no signs of relenting on his dominant wireless carrier America Movil.Historically overcharged, Mexicans saw a 17 %,, sound just like AT&T in US, doesn't ? Yet AT&T will continue "investing" billions of dollars to support such projects, totally financed through layoff, Still, Mexico’s mobile market share has barely shifted, with America Movil serving about 68 percent of the country, down just a few ticks from 70 percent six years ago.

What is AT&T doing about It? ....." complain " of an uneven market and have called for asymmetric rules designed to affect America Movil and benefit its rivals, while America Movil argues that competition is thriving and regulations should be lifted.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nct+IvQIp8a

expansive metrics don't tell the real story, "Big numbers don't necessarily mean success,, You can have a lot of users, a huge installed base, a huge market cap, but you're dying of old age, you're rotting from the inside. When was the last time anyone talked about TT&T as interesting or compelling or innovative?"

Companies perceived as interesting and innovative, such as Facebook and Google, have kept their product-focus sharp, while AT&T has done the opposite, expensive acquisitions without a real plan, buy, buy, buy, the shiny syndrome that killed yahoo, While Google has also wheeled out an array of products, demonstrates its dominance .

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bya+IvQIp8a

Welcome to your world destroyed!! It looks like Verizon is about to get Yahoo, maybe ATT should get in the pizza delivery service , since the Co.have a fleet of Trucks , technicians, and GPS all over the map

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ckh+IvQIp8a

Post a reply

: