Thread regarding Verizon Communications Inc. layoffs

VERIZON WORKERS HAVE THE BETTER ARGUMENT

We’ve looked at the Verizon (stock symbol VZ) situation for a few weeks now and read statements by both the company and its union. An examination of Verizon’s latest 10-Q SEC filing does not support the company’s position, that financial stress forces VZ to fire its call center emp0loyees and outsource the work to India. To demonstrate my conclusion, at the end of this report, I reprint, from Yahoo’s finance pages, the 10-Q filed last month, a report which says it all.

If you study this report you will see that Verizon income is not sufferingh, nor does it appear to face any downturn. Operating income is holding steady, expenses as well; the firm’s EBITDA (earnings before income tax, depreciation and amortization) run about 22 percent of revenues, good enough to support a dividend distributed from an AFTER TAX 15 percent profit.

If VZ’s after tax profit came in at about five percent, or less, there would be an argument for slashing employee costs; although even then, I think it a foolish economy to fire long-established, home front employees in favor of poorly paid, overseas workers hard to0 monitor and/or discipline. With profit at 15 percent, no such argument makes any sense at all. VZ must keep its domestic call center people and accord them all the wage and benefits that top quality workers merit. In addition, VZ should allow its wireless employees to unionize if they wish to form one. VZ should welcome that its wireless employees want to stay on the job rather than create the expense and distractions of worker turnover.

I cannot imagine that VZ’s top managers do not understand all of the above. What, then, can possibly be driving them to disrupt the firm’s operations, as they have ? It seems that the initiating force is investor desire to “maximize” value, i.e., to wrench VZ stock from the high $ 40s to, maybe a temporary $ 60 per share based on cutting employee costs.

If stock speculation by vast pools of wanderlust money is the force at work upon VZ, it should be cut down. Speculation of publicly traded stock is the single most damaging fdeature of our macro economy today. Speculative manipulation, and rapid-fire trading upon temporary inefficiencies, aids no one but the speculators. The money pushed into quickie manipulations doesn’t invest in a product, doesn’t aid a service, doesn’t assist employees, doesn’t innovate the economy. It is an entirely inbred self serving of money for moneys’ sake. It is NOT capitalism. I am not sure what kind of ism it IS.

It may be many years before the ills of speculation are curbed (and they can be curbed, by tax rules, by SEC regulations, by Federal Reserve margin requirements, and by corporate governance law reform), the only weapon that the capitalist economy has is a workers’ strike. Make no mistake ; a company’s workers are an asset. A MAJOR asset. Their skill, their reliability, and yes, their good earnings are vital to the probity and market power of an enterprise. Verizon workers striking are doing the work of capitalism, and we who support the indomitable power of capitalist operations should thank the striking Verizon workers.

Verizon’s first 2016

by
| 946 views | | 6 replies (last May 22, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+Hw8Kll7

6 replies (most recent on top)

Interesting points, but I think you are missing the essential point. The #1 priority for the management of any company of any kind is to maximize the return on investment of its shareholders. Right or wrong (I think they are probably right, but completely respect your right to disagree), the company management and the shareholders believe that, if they are legally allowed to do so, they can hire and train non-union folks who can do almost or equally as well as the union employees, but at a much, much lower cost to the company. It is not just higher salaries and better benefits. It is avoiding this expensive and wasteful exercise every three years. As many here have noted, negotiating and preparing for a strike costs the company billions. A long strike like this one is even more costly and hurts the company in lots of different ways.

I think what a lot of us are wondering is when does the company reach the point that they are willing to take the pain and move on from the unions completely. Given how much money the company spent in preparation for this strike, and what they have said since it started, I think that is what is happening right now. but, no one can be certain that will actually happen.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vak+Hw8Kll7

ITS ASSHAT MAN

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vmg+Hw8Kll7

You just mentioned the staggering debt, Thanks.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vlz+Hw8Kll7

Wow. Thanks for that long winded, rambling post. Your forgot to mention the staggering amount if debt Verizon carries...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tvn+Hw8Kll7

It's not only landline, It's also FIOS, which Verizon invested Billions

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ivr+Hw8Kll7

Unfortunately, that is not how the investment community values/views our company or any other large multinational corporation.

They see a shrinking segment of the business that is modestly profitable in the report you reference (2Q2016 results). They see people disconnecting land line and a core landline customer base that is well over the age of 60.

It is/was the Innovator's Dilemma.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aup+Hw8Kll7

Post a reply

: