Thread regarding Verizon Communications Inc. layoffs

Over 86 Members of Congress issue a following joint statement regarding the Verizon strike and ongoing labor negotiations:

“We applaud Verizon’s success and its ability to be profitable throughout the changes that have taken place in the telecommunications industry, but are deeply concerned about the ongoing Verizon strike.”

“Verizon workers build, install and maintain the state-of-the-art FiOS broadband system, and ensure that the millions of customers still reliant on the copper network continue to receive high quality service. In addition, Verizon Wireless retail store workers and technicians work in one of the most profitable sectors of the economy. We are troubled that the lack of a negotiated labor agreement could increase the likelihood that good jobs will be offshored to the Philippines, Mexico and other locations overseas or outsourced to low-wage, non-union domestic contractors. And we are concerned that Verizon wireless retail workers, who joined the union back in 2014, still have not been able to negotiate improvements in their wages, benefits and working conditions.”

“It has been reported that Verizon’s highly skilled union workforce has declined by nearly 40 percent over the last decade. We are concerned that proposed changes in the new contract could continue that downward spiral. While we are heartened by Verizon’s announced intention to offer FiOS broadband service in additional cities, such as Boston, many communities across the country are still waiting. We hope that Verizon will be committed to hiring and retaining the skilled staff necessary to complete the buildout of its FiOS broadband service in a timely manner in all markets.”

“We urge the parties to negotiate in good faith and agree to a fair contract. We firmly believe it is in the public interest to protect middle class jobs, reduce outsourcing and offshoring, and ensure high quality telecommunications services to the public.”

The 88 Members who are signed onto this statement are:

Rep. Robert C. “Bobby” Scott

Rep. Jerrold Nadler

Rep. Alma S. Adams

Rep. Joyce Beatty

Rep. Donald S. Beyer, Jr.

Rep. Brendan F. Boyle

Rep. Robert A. Brady

Rep. Julia Brownley

Rep. Michael E. Capuano

Rep. Matt Cartwright

Rep. Judy Chu

Rep. David N. Cicilline

Rep. Katherine M. Clark

Rep. Yvette D. Clarke

Rep. Gerald E. Connolly

Rep. John Conyers, Jr.

Rep. Joe Courtney

Rep. Joseph Crowley

Rep. Elijah E. Cummings

Rep. Susan A. Davis

Rep. Rosa L. DeLauro

Rep. Suzan DelBene

Rep. Mark DeSaulnier

Rep. Debbie Dingell

Rep. Michael F. Doyle

Rep. Donna F. Edwards

Rep. Keith Ellison

Rep. Eliot L. Engel

Rep. Elizabeth Esty

Rep. Marcia L. Fudge

Rep. Ruben Gallego

Rep. Alan Grayson

Rep. Gene Green

Rep. Raúl M. Grijalva

Rep. Brian Higgins

Rep. Michael M. Honda

Rep. Jared Huffman

Rep. Steve Israel

Rep. Hakeem S. Jeffries

Rep. Marcy Kaptur

Rep. William R. Keating

Rep. Joseph P. Kennedy, III

Rep. Dan Kildee

Rep. Anne McLane Kuster

Rep. James R. Langevin

Rep. John B. Larson

Rep. Barbara Lee

Rep. Sander M. Levin

Rep. Alan S. Lowenthal

Rep. Nita M. Lowey

Rep. Stephen F. Lynch

Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney

Rep. Carolyn Maloney

Rep. Betty McCollum

Rep. Jim McDermott

Rep. James P. McGovern

Rep. Grace Meng

Rep. Seth Moulton

Rep. Grace F. Napolitano

Rep. Richard E. Neal

Rep. Richard M. Nolan

Rep. Donald Norcross

Rep. Frank Pallone, Jr.

Rep. Bill Pascrell, Jr.

Rep. Donald M. Payne, Jr.

Rep. Chellie Pingree

Rep. Mark Pocan

Rep. Charles B. Rangel

Rep. Lucille Royball-Allard

Rep. Tim Ryan

Rep. Gregorio Kilili Camacho Sablan

Rep. Linda T. Sánchez

Rep. John P. Sarbanes

Rep. Janice D. Schakowsky

Rep. Adam B. Schiff

Rep. José E. Serrano

Rep. Albio Sires

Rep. Louise McIntosh Slaughter

Rep. Mark Takano

Rep. Dina Titus

Rep. Paul Tonko

Rep. Niki Tsongas

Rep. Chris Van Hollen

Rep. Filemon Vela

Rep. Nydia M. Velázquez

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz

Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman

Rep. Frederica S. Wilson

by
| 1707 views | | 19 replies (last May 20, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+Hug3NnS

19 replies (most recent on top)

STOP the p.r. campaign and get it done!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vxi+Hug3NnS

Really

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mfg+Hug3NnS

And the last time Verizon CARED about these types of things was when exactly?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @twk+Hug3NnS

So Michigan should get Fios too, Rep. Debbie Dingell (MI) says so above. Talk about uninformed, wow.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fwz+Hug3NnS

Only 86 out of 197 Democrats currently in the House of Representatives?

Really? That's all?

Where are the other 111?

Don't they support the unions enough to sign a stupid letter?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fgl+Hug3NnS

I applaud these guys

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lul+Hug3NnS

@ooz - agreed, they are both part of the problem, not the solution. Both parties cater to the rich and give the shaft to everyone else.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @llo+Hug3NnS

"Now it's the land of the fee and home of the slave to the corporate America oligarchy."

Thanks to members of both ruling parties...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ooz+Hug3NnS

He who has the most money makes the rules and stacks the deck against the rest of us, plain and simple. Oh so easy when those in D.C. recieve legal bribes and payoffs. We are truly an oligarchy who used to be a constitutional republic. Now it's the land of the fee and home of the slave to the corporate America oligarchy.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hem+Hug3NnS

Astute observations below. Perhaps the 86 would like Verizon to hire some of the undocumented aliens to take on temporary technician jobs and be hired full time if the union is broken as in Lowell's strategy.

Just saying...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vuz+Hug3NnS

@qmw, incorrect, we are not a "capatilist" (catapultist? Capitulatist?), we are a crony capitalist oligarchy

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ewv+Hug3NnS

Exactly, fyh. "Shocking!!!!!!" that they're all D's. Entitlements. Handouts. Freebies. Hell, lets even start asking for free education. Oh, wait ....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sog+Hug3NnS

We are a capatlist country. The free market should decide, not the government. Period!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qmw+Hug3NnS

LOL. Congress complaining about the off shoring of jobs when it was Congress that pit in place the Free Trade Agreements that allow for such off shoring in the first place.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qzg+Hug3NnS

"86 out of 535 means that the rest are corporate lobbyist money junky whores that can give a crap less about the middle class since they are already filthy rich."

Just shows how many people in government are bought and sold to the highest and richest bidder and don't really represent the rest of us that aren't.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tii+Hug3NnS

86 out 535 means that the rest are corporate lobbyist money junky whores that can give a crap less about the middle class since they are already filthy rich.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hup+Hug3NnS

So there are 535 members of Congress..... 86/535............ 16% feel they need to send some letter supporting the Union, what does that tell you?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jyk+Hug3NnS

Hopping on the political bandwagon now that it's almost over.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dhp+Hug3NnS

Gee Surprise!!!! All Democrats...LOL

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fyh+Hug3NnS

Post a reply

: