Thread regarding Verizon Communications Inc. layoffs

Verizon To Dump 6,000 Jobs - Continued for 2016

(Mark Davis) Verizon may be laying off as many as 6,000 employees as rival Sprint culls its payroll, according to a Wall Street analyst.

Jeffrey Kvaal, with Nomura Securities International, wrote in a note to clients that Verizon employees had been informed of the cutbacks. Kvaal cited a Bloomberg article about Verizon’s plan to reorganize its wireless business and reduce its wireless employee count.

“Although the company did not specify the magnitude of the cuts, nor the areas impacted, our checks suggest the cuts will be broad-based and impact 5-6k (5,000 to 6,000) employees,” his note about Verizon said.

Jeffrey Nelson, vice president of corporate communication at Verizon, declined to address the number of layoffs Kvaal indicated but acknowledged earlier statements that job cuts would be part of the reorganization.

Verizon wireless employs about 180,000, according to Kvaal, who said he would not be surprised if the layoffs involved the company’s “legacy wireline business” as well.

He also put savings from the cutbacks and other reorganization efforts at Verizon at between $500 million and $600 million. He wrote that he hoped for more details when Verizon management meets with analysts on Monday.

Sprint has said that it is in the process of finding $2 billion in operating cost savings and that layoffs will be part of that effort. It has not said how many jobs will be involved.

Sprint officials do not expect layoffs to cover all of those savings and have identified other cuts as well. For example, Sprint has told employees it is “going paperless,” with plans to pull printers and copiers from offices soon, and the company announced lower severance benefits for employees notified of a layoff after Jan. 30 of next year.

Layoffs and voluntary job reductions late last year and early this year eliminated 3,700 jobs at Sprint, which is based in Overland Park.

http://www.govtslaves.info/verizon-to-dump-6000-jobs/

by
| 1590 views | | 11 replies (last May 19, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+Hty8hr5

11 replies (most recent on top)

There was about 5000 Verizon employees rif'd In November. I was one of them....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dzb+Hty8hr5

Old news. We all know RIFs are coming. We've known it and have seen it for the last couple of years. Our numbers may or may not come. Life goes on.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xhs+Hty8hr5

Across the oceans a recent article in November identifies Verizon employees in India as "6000-strong." Interestingly what qualifies as strong?

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/telecom/verizon-partnering-indian-system-integrators-for-global-market/articleshow/49627509.cms

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @krx+Hty8hr5

6000 definitely not been let go yet. The reduction would most likely be to come. Yes with a contract there will have to be a trade off.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @czl+Hty8hr5

llt good question, 6000 is VERY BIG and would have been noticed company-wide. Probably about 400 managers. smart not to do so during the then impending work stoppage.How will the remaining deficit be resolved?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @agx+Hty8hr5

Yes llt. At least 6000 did not have a Merry Christmas. People over 50 were a favorite target. They were very kind helping Granny and Grandpa out the door with a golden boot and gave a nice severance package that would last to September. They could even keep their Credo if they wanted.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kvc+Hty8hr5

Found the original article that was posted late October. http://www.kansascity.com/news/business/article41984931.html

Did Verizon dump the the 6000 employees last Nov or after Jan 30, 2016? or was all or some of it put on hold for then impending strike?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @llt+Hty8hr5

Rural Telecom Fairpoint settled their strike not too long ago and ended up with layoffs afterwards I believe it was in Vermont? Ironically Vz previously owned the geographic landline area. It was no surprise considering that the landline business was and still is spiraling. It was a strategic move based on economics and probably would've happened whether or not Vz owned it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jct+Hty8hr5

Old article yes but, they will have to pay for the signed contract somehow. Nothing will be coming out of their pockets.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ntt+Hty8hr5

jut, that's hilarious, you are correct. The OP is using today's date but referencing an article from 2015. Here is the original article from October.

http://www.kansascity.com/news/business/article41984931.html

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yje+Hty8hr5

That was last year. Already happened.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jut+Hty8hr5

Post a reply

: