Thread regarding Verizon Communications Inc. layoffs

Fran Shammo says...

Check out tweet from Howard Buskirk (telecom reporter in DC). @hbuskirk

He says Verizon CFO says there are signs strike is coming to an end, but under gag order so he cannot say more.

by
| 2536 views | | 16 replies (last May 19, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+Ht6tgwS

16 replies (most recent on top)

Bua- thanks. I've been working on EIS bids for months and has no idea this was the former Networx!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fxi+Ht6tgwS

For the purpose of this thread, the Networkx contract referenced is actually called "EIS" and it will be awarded this fall. Huge contract worth $50 billion over 15 years, anticipated to service at least 30 percent of the $6 billion annual addressable federal communications market.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bua+Ht6tgwS

My point is Verizon should know the mediatior will be involved if the negotiation doesn't go well. If this contract is so important to them, they should have given union a better offer than the LBFO and negotiated with the Union every week. As I know the company hadn't talk to District 1 for two weeks and District 2-13 for a week before the labor secretary step in.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @evc+Ht6tgwS

rjt: The Networkx contract is definitely true, it's coming up for re-bid in a few months. Yes, it has to be re-bid, but Verizon is the incumbent and has the majority of that revenue today. I have to believe the the strike and potential issues with labor troubles would have some bearing on whether VZ wins any of it. And as the incumbent, VZ has far more to lose than anyone else -- millions and millions of dollars of existing revenue.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hpe+Ht6tgwS

If the Networkx contract is true, Verizon still need to bid. No guarantee it will win.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rjt+Ht6tgwS

@Ht6tgwS-cbd GAG is a technical term used in negotiations, it's not used in a legal context here, it's merely a tool used in multilateral negotiations

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xsd+Ht6tgwS

He's not under a gag order. That would require a court to prevent him from taking.

In this case, all sides agreed not to speak to the media about the negotiations. Its voluntary.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cbd+Ht6tgwS

psp ..... You would surprised how an important of a role this is now.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qne+Ht6tgwS

Someone posted in another thread that the government Networkx contract which is worth half a billion dollars and VZ is the incumbent on might have something to do with the cooperation now that the gov't is involved. I have no idea if that's true, but it wouldn't surprise me things move quickly at this point.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @psp+Ht6tgwS

Funny someone brought up the 20th. The strike will be over by this weekend with workers returning next week, they have a 72 hour threshold to return after announcement is made, I believe.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @idb+Ht6tgwS

After reading the Fortune article that came out today, It's in everyone's best interest to come to agreement.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cub+Ht6tgwS

I think that reporter is just giving old info. He is saying the progress Fran talks about is the fact there are meetings. Nothing new to see here.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qle+Ht6tgwS

So, either the reporter is taken what he said out of context or had a different conversation with him...both possible and positive.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dtg+Ht6tgwS

I listened to Fran at the MoffettNathanson Summit, he said that fact that there is a meeting shows progress, he didn't say anything about the strike ending early or the labor dispute being resolved.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ffm+Ht6tgwS

Just read that , too... At least it's somewhat credible... Let's hope it's true!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ari+Ht6tgwS

Yeah well it's obviously moving towards an end one way or the other. Tomorrow is the 20th.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wdu+Ht6tgwS

Post a reply

: