http://www.ibtimes.com/att-president-aaron-slator-fired-racist-images-texts-amid-100m-discrimination-lawsuit-1900901
This is not good for AT&T. No one wants this type of reputation.
http://www.ibtimes.com/att-president-aaron-slator-fired-racist-images-texts-amid-100m-discrimination-lawsuit-1900901
This is not good for AT&T. No one wants this type of reputation.
Women given very senior rolls in the recent years is a very interesting trend within AT&T. It is like AT&T is trying to prove something. Shouldn't people be promoted because of their qualification not due to gender or race. This trend in promoting people due to gender to high levels of management is actually back firing on AT&T overall.
This is old news ,nothing new ATT has been sued several times for discrimination/racism
also will like to comment about women given senior roles who aren't qualified, well this is also True that some Men get promoted to high positions and are not QUALIFIED either.
"Let's face it, being the boss means that you are in a power position and have control over those who report to you, and it can be tempting to take out your own disappointment on those in a weaker position." And that is the tool they are using now, to force many people out of their payroll
Randall may be watching,... you may receive a call from his lawyers..
It is actually surprising that many people did not realize that this happened at AT&T. This attitude is not only with one guy but is still widely spread in senior level management. Senior level managers are trying to hide by implementing diversity training, bring more women into senior ranks whether they deserve to be or not. But, it is not working. To kill this type of thing, the head needs to be cut off so to speak. Leadership needs to change from an old boys network.
Yeah its pretty old. We already got the popcorn and the picture show on the company's stance on inclusion and diversity.
Old news