Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

New motivational message: "We're worth $17 !!!"

They're just kind of taking it now. LOL

by
| 932 views | | 15 replies (last April 28, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1scr3bbW

15 replies (most recent on top)

“Stankey was very irritated at the meeting Wednesday 4/24 because the day before when he met with the managers, who were there for training their concerns were RTO and stock price. This po'd him since this is not a focus of managers. Those are NOT concerns for him because: 1. Before covid they worked in the office 3 days or more then and this RTO is no different. 2. The stock at $17 is because we did what we said and it will not move until we get more shareholder value by lowering the debt. So quit saying the stock is low and hasn't moved until we lower debt. He is off looking for new PJs for his next skit while employees are trying to get by with high inflation, threat of layoffs, threats of war, high crime,......”

So you’re saying he’s out of touch - got it.
I hope people keep bi--hing and and pi----g him off, the issue isn’t being in the office 3 days a week (but we weren’t monitored like babies before) the issue is him forcing people to move cross country.

Maybe eventually he will get the message and back off the forced relocation/RTO bs. Unlikely though, he will probably just keep pushing it til morale is so low and everyone is so disengaged people just start letting things fall apart.
We’re already basically doing it on our team, “oh you want us to move and I’m going to just lose my job? Fine this thing breaks, I’ll get to it eventually” and eventually you get cascades of failures.

This, combined with all these security updates they’re mandating due to the leak, and we’ve had layers of systems breaking and I’ve stopped caring.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4cpx+1scr3bbW

"Stankey was very irritated at the meeting Wednesday 4/24 because the day before when he met with the managers"

The id--t failed to realize that the Q1 Results meeting was for the whole company, not just those in the LwD training the day before. Mr. "Win As One" spent the hour making it obvious that he was only speaking to the "chosen" and left the rest of us out.

It would have been different if the meeting was billed as the closing of the LwD session, that we got to listen in on.

On top of that, you got the ATG guy that starts the meeting with the excited "all your questions will be answered", of which, none of our questions were answered.

We need a meme of Space Ba--s with Stankey as Dark Helmet, Legg as President Skroob, and McElfresh as Major A--hole.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3lbg+1scr3bbW

"Is Stankey setting the AT&T stock price too low? Should he be setting a higher price?"

This is sarcasm, right?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3dvk+1scr3bbW

Stankey was very irritated at the meeting Wednesday 4/24 because the day before when he met with the managers, who were there for training their concerns were RTO and stock price. This po'd him since this is not a focus of managers. Those are NOT concerns for him because: 1. Before covid they worked in the office 3 days or more then and this RTO is no different. 2. The stock at $17 is because we did what we said and it will not move until we get more shareholder value by lowering the debt. So quit saying the stock is low and hasn't moved until we lower debt. He is off looking for new PJs for his next skit while employees are trying to get by with high inflation, threat of layoffs, threats of war, high crime,......

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3fyf+1scr3bbW

Is Stankey setting the AT&T stock price too low? Should he be setting a higher price?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2hpw+1scr3bbW

Wall Street isn’t stupid. No matter what numbers they put up, they know that’s it’s the same guy in charge that was there when all of these bad acquisitions were made. Until he is gone there will be no confidence that more id--tic moves won’t be made again. Nothing more to it, nothing less.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2lnn+1scr3bbW

Lower your expectations.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qqe+1scr3bbW

The stock is $17 because we did what we said we would do according to Stankey. Then why don't we do more and get it to go up? Because Stankey doesn't have any good ideas or plans for the future: he's happy being mediocre (and mean)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1shm+1scr3bbW

T would be worth more if they had more revenue. Too bad they don't have revenue from streaming.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1beh+1scr3bbW

We predicted the stock wouldn’t move much and you know why? Because we did what we said we were going to do!

HUH????!!

(He literally has NO IDEA how to move the needle and it’s eating him up.)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wpx+1scr3bbW
“ Keep complaining about the stock price. It's going to pay off soon.”

Unlikely.
I sold all my ages ago and got NVDA.
That’s already paid off.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qsg+1scr3bbW

Keep complaining about the stock price. It's going to pay off soon.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pia+1scr3bbW

It will go up once he leaves. The exact same thing happened when Steve Ballmer of Microsoft was replaced. I think it may reach 20ish.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @iyc+1scr3bbW

Got to love it!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @baa+1scr3bbW

We have been “worth $17” for YEARS now!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hza+1scr3bbW

Post a reply

: