I’ve had experience with JD Power and Associates at a previous company, a service where companies pay for evaluation of their customer support policies and procedures. This includes reviewing customer satisfaction metrics and other analytical reports. Although results generally favor the company.
Companies often prefer a slightly lower customer satisfaction rate (like 92-93%) over a higher one (99%) because the cost of maintaining near-perfect satisfaction is significantly higher. This approach allows companies to monetize the gap, often by offshoring less critical support services to save costs. For example, handling low-level technical issues with less skilled staff. This strategy is particularly evident in how companies treat different customer segments, prioritizing more important clients like government agencies. This can branch into professional services where income can be generated.
The key is maintaining a balance between service quality and cost. JD Power’s role in this is not altruistic; they are a paid service, and their assessments should be seen in this context. Their service is valuable to public perception, but it’s essential to understand that it’s part of a business strategy, not a charitable offering.