Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

Wouldn't it be funny if AT&T needed a contingency plan... for the contingency plan?

Despite AT&T HR calling you "managers," a lot of you are not supervisors per the definition of the NLRA

(11) The term "supervisor" means any individual having authority, in the interest of the employer, to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibly to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action, if in connection with the foregoing the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment.

Many of you ARE eligible for coverage under the NLRA. Keep that in mind if you find that you are being inadequately trained for your CP assignment. Online courses with quizzes that you can copy/paste the answers of is not a stand-in for actual field experience and expertise.

Would you hire an electrician to work on your teeth if he took 60 hours worth of online courses and practiced once on a dummy? I wouldn't, but I'll hire them to do electrical work.

There's a reason why AT&T pays premium for people with actual know-how. You're not going to supplant a professional and you'll just put yourself in unnecessary danger. All for a company who doesn't care about you.

by
| 1407 views | | 14 replies (last February 10, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1qWYLdRp

14 replies (most recent on top)

"Nothing more than theater."

100%. I'm required to take the training, but nothing says I have to retain it. If I get deployed, I'm not touching a bit of fiber or copper. I'll drive the truck/van, I'll carry a tool box, I'll even go get coffee. But I'm not going up a ladder, I'm not touching a strand, and I'm not touching a customers house.

I do have respect for the union workers that do the job, and I think the company craps on them as much as they do the non-bargained exempt employees. We should stick together. The C Suite loves to say employees make the company, but the reality is they'd get rid of us all in a heartbeat if they could.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4eut+1qWYLdRp

So glad I no longer have to worry about a contingency assignment. I was part of the team that covered the strike in Florida. Most of us sat in the conference room because we didn’t feel comfortable going out to do the jobs. The grass is greener on the other side. So glad to be done with AT&T.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ued+1qWYLdRp
  • “To the software engineer. You should not go all the way up to the power lines. The strand is 3 feet below the power lines, and that's where the telco cables are. Better to pay attention to the video so you don't electrocute yourself.”

Rofl.
I go up to the power lines to put myself out of my misery that this company’s poor decisions have imposed upon me.

I just couldn’t imagine sitting through another Stankey Legg jerk session town hall, so I decided to end it all.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bip+1qWYLdRp
The whole contingency planning / training fiasco is nothing more than theatre. I thought everyone understood this.

Of course it is. But so of course is the union saber rattling.

Both sides want to get us engaged and both are FOS.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fyz+1qWYLdRp

Aww how cute, you think it takes extensive training to perform most union jobs.

4 hours ago by Anonymous | 7 reactions (+5/-2)
Post ID: @zth+1qWYLdRp

You probably will have to "Live your Destination" and RTO before to company asks, no demands you report to your CP assignment. That is if you are lucky. You consider yourself smart, you collaborate on TEAMS instead of the morning meeting that the Union Dregs attend. You have skills that you think are unique to you, no one can easily replace you.
AT&T is going to replace you very soon with some very fine men and women for 10 cents on the Dollar who reside in India. You will be asked to perform a "knowledge transfer" to receive your severance if you had anything AT&T needs.

It su-ks for you. I don't make to the rules. I just watch how folks fight and struggle, lash out at others and try to tear others down with them when the rules come down on them.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cir+1qWYLdRp

To the software engineer. You should not go all the way up to the power lines. The strand is 3 feet below the power lines, and that's where the telco cables are. Better to pay attention to the video so you don't electrocute yourself.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bqz+1qWYLdRp

No.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cyy+1qWYLdRp

Contingency assignments aren't optional. I got the impression non participation could have a bad impact on performance evaluation and bonuses. I doubt many "managers" are happy to get an assignment.
Not many would say they were ready to go to the job after completing training.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wmp+1qWYLdRp

Nothing more than theater. Perfect explanation. Just do what your told and for gods sake don’t get hurt. It ain’t worth that.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nut+1qWYLdRp

“Aww how cute, you think it takes extensive training to perform most union jobs.”

It does trust me. It’s easy if you know it and impossible if you don’t. Even the technicians can’t transition from inside to outside without years of OJT.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kyo+1qWYLdRp

25+ year non bargained for here.

You’re correct in that of course the training isn’t adequate,

That said how could it be? There is no substitute for the hands on experience of a seasoned field person.

To that end, it’s sort of expected that everything will grind to a halt in a work stoppage.

The whole contingency planning / training fiasco is nothing more than theatre. I thought everyone understood this.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ers+1qWYLdRp
  • “Aww how cute, you think it takes extensive training to perform most union jobs.”

I love how true management (Stankey and Co.) has made morale so bad that even the employees are fighting amongst themselves.
Love to see it, top tier Ivy League management strategies at play here, obviously.

Normal ‘managers’ and most union employees are actually on the same side, most ‘management’ corporate employees don’t actually make any management decisions that effect techs in the field at all - they’re data analysts, software engineers, etc…

It’s unfortunate to see everyone bickering when they should be siding against the C-Suite that has ran this company into the ground with bad decision after bad decision.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gzp+1qWYLdRp

Aww how cute, you think it takes extensive training to perform most union jobs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zth+1qWYLdRp

You’re not wrong, but we don’t have a choice. It becomes required training.
I got tapped to do this one year, you know what I did? Let it play in the background while I worked.
I retained literally 0 of the knowledge as it doesn’t pertain to my career at all.

The whole system makes literally 0 sense, sending software engineers up onto power lines.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @stg+1qWYLdRp

Post a reply

: