Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Wells Fargo Preps for Wealth Battle After $1 Billion Turnaround

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-09-23/wells-fargo-preps-for-wealth-battle-after-1-billion-turnaround?embedded-checkout=true

WHAT $1 Billion turnaround are they referring to? 😂 I work for WFA and have only seen cost-cutting, short-staffed departments, and the systems still su-k. Who’s going to service the new FAs?

Can anyone get access to this article?

by
| 1442 views | | 8 replies (last September 25, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1oKsgnnW

8 replies (most recent on top)

Barry will be the next CEO. He will be groomed with good news until then

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2gfh+1oKsgnnW

Barry has survived on his chiseled good looks and flirting with CNBC hosts

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2nll+1oKsgnnW

Wealth contributes like 10% of net income. It is consistently the least profitable division because it spends most of the money it makes on itself, and that’s true across the banking industry. It’s just always going to be funny that rich people think that serving other rich people is very important when the ROI stinks and the regulatory burden is huge.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cxh+1oKsgnnW

More like a reacharound.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hsr+1oKsgnnW

Wells can't do anything without being fraudulent. Let's take this division. I use the following prompt and replace with "wealth and investment management unit".
AI Prompt:
What is Wells Fargo latest scandal regarding its ? When was this scandal first reported? What have regulators done or can do if Wells Fargo is guilty?


Wells Fargo's latest scandal regarding its wealth and investment management unit was first reported in August 2023. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) alleged that Wells Fargo overcharged nearly 11,000 investment advisory accounts about $27 million in fees. The bank agreed to pay a $35 million civil penalty to settle the matter, and also paid account holders about $40 million to reimburse them for the overcharged fees.

The SEC's investigation found that Wells Fargo charged certain clients excessive fees for investment advice, in some cases by as much as 100%. The agency also found that Wells Fargo failed to disclose its fee structure to clients in a clear and concise manner.

If Wells Fargo is found guilty of the allegations against it, regulators have a wide range of options available to them. These include:

Fines: Regulators can fine Wells Fargo large sums of money, which can be a significant deterrent to misconduct. In 2020, for example, Wells Fargo was fined $3 billion by the Justice Department and other regulators for its role in the fake account scandal.
Asset caps: Regulators can limit the amount of assets that Wells Fargo can hold, which can restrict its growth and profitability. This is a measure that the Federal Reserve has used against Wells Fargo since 2016.
Cease-and-desist orders: Regulators can order Wells Fargo to stop engaging in certain activities, such as overcharging clients for investment advice.
Divestiture: In extreme cases, regulators can force Wells Fargo to sell off some of its assets or businesses. This is a measure that has been used against other banks that have engaged in serious misconduct.
In addition to these enforcement actions, regulators can also require Wells Fargo to take steps to improve its compliance and risk management practices. This could include hiring new compliance personnel, developing new training programs, and implementing new systems and procedures.

It is important to note that the specific actions that regulators would take against Wells Fargo would depend on the severity of the misconduct and the bank's history of compliance violations. However, the above list provides a general overview of the range of options available to regulators.

In addition to the above, it is also possible that Wells Fargo executives could face criminal charges if they are found to have been personally involved in the misconduct.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kgj+1oKsgnnW

Turn around
Every now and then I get a little bit lonely
And you never coming 'round
Turn around
Every now and then I get a little bit tired
Of listening to the sound of my tears

Turn around
Every now and then I get a little bit nervous
That the best of all the years have gone by
Turn around
Every now and then I get a little bit terrified
And then I see the look in your eyes

Turn around, bright eyes
Every now and then I fall apart
Turn around, bright eyes
Every now and then I fall apart

Turn around
Every now and then I get a little bit restless
And I dream of something wild
Turn around
Every now and then I get a little bit helpless
And I'm lying like a child in your arms

Turn around
Every now and then I get a little bit angry
And I know I've got to get out and cry
Turn around
Every now and then I get a little bit terrified
But then I see the look in your eyes

Turn around, bright eyes
Every now and then I fall apart
Turn around, bright eyes
Every now and then I fall apart

And I need you now tonight
And I need you more than ever
And if you only hold me tight
We'll be holding on forever
And we'll only be making it right
'Cause we'll never be wrong
Together we can take it to the end of the line
Our love is like a shadow on me all of the time

I don't know what to do and I'm always in the dark
We're living in a powder keg and giving off sparks
I really need you tonight
Forever's gonna start tonight
Forever's gonna start tonight

Once upon a time, I was falling in love
Now I'm only falling apart
There's nothing I can do
A total eclipse of the heart

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jfa+1oKsgnnW

Three years and nearly $1 billion later, Wells Fargo & Co. is finally playing offense in one of Wall Street’s hottest battlegrounds: wealth management.
The banking giant is trying to lure hundreds of independent advisers to join its platform as part of a larger push to expand the firm’s business catering to rich clients, according to Barry Sommers, who oversees Wells Fargo’s wealth and investment management unit. The independent offering is already Wells Fargo’s fastest-growing wealth channel.
“We believe over the next three to five years there’s a significant opportunity to gain a lot of market share,” Sommers said in an interview from Wells Fargo’s offices in New York’s Hudson Yards neighborhood.
The moves are a far cry from just a few years ago, when Wells Fargo’s wealth division was hit particularly hard by a series of scandals that have long plagued the bank. Advisers were fleeing by the thousands and, what’s worse, they were taking their lucrative clients with them.
When Chief Executive Officer Charlie Scharf took the reins at Wells Fargo in 2019, he quickly tagged the firm’s wealth offerings as an area he’d seek to develop. For the turnaround, Scharf turned to Sommers.

The division’s assets under management don’t sit on the firm’s balance sheet, so Wells Fargo can expand in wealth management without running up against a Federal Reserve-imposed asset cap that’s prohibited the firm from growing beyond its size at the end of 2017.
Upgrading Systems
It’s not the first time Sommers and Scharf have set out to improve a bank’s wealth operations: The pair previously worked together at JPMorgan Chase & Co., where they developed a private client offering to serve wealthy branch customers.
After Sommers joined Wells Fargo in 2020, he asked Scharf for $1 billion to invest over multiple years in the beleaguered division, according to person familiar with the matter, who asked not to be named discussing internal deliberations. He then spent the intervening years remaking the unit’s management team, simplifying its structure and upgrading the technology.
“Fixing the place” was step one when he arrived, Sommers said, declining to comment on the precise amount the company invested in the business. The 54-year-old was responsible for everything “from digital account opening to getting rid of fax machines, I mean you name it.”
Banks large and small have swarmed the wealth-management space in recent years, citing the explosion in global wealth and opportunity for steady fee income. Forging closer ties to rich customers also offers connectivity with other businesses, such as investment banking.

One of Sommers’s first moves was to slim down the number of ways Wells Fargo distributes its different wealth offerings. These days, the firm has just three of these so-called channels: advisers that sit in bank branches across the country, the firm’s traditional wirehouse and FiNet, the fast-growing network of independent advisers.
Already, that makes Wells Fargo unique. The firm is one of just four banks that house a major wirehouse offering. The others - Bank of America Corp.’s Merrill Ly--h, Morgan Stanley and UBS Group AG - don’t have an independent option for advisers to go to whenever they’re looking to leave.
In recent weeks, Wells Fargo lured teams from Morgan Stanley and Raymond James Financial Inc. to the independent platform. The wirehouse offering has also been adding a bevy of talent recently, including two advisers in Fort Worth from JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Wells Fargo has had the FiNet offering for more than 20 years; already, it’s home to more than 1,600 advisers. That compares with the 12,000 employed across the traditional wirehouse and branch offering at year-end.

The advisers in FiNet are contractors rather than Wells Fargo employees. That means they get higher annual payouts but also shoulder more of the costs associated with their business; for instance, independent advisers are responsible for securing office space and equipment, training and paying underlings and doing their own marketing.
Still, the setup is less profitable for Wells Fargo. But the lender views it as an opportunity to boost revenue while keeping more of its advisers on its platform.
“We really do believe that five years from now the independent channel will be our biggest channel,” Sommers said. “We’re not sitting there worrying about margins, we’re worrying about building the right platform for advisers and clients.”

🤮

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mvc+1oKsgnnW

What turnaround? Totally agree.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lnh+1oKsgnnW

Post a reply

: