Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Military Vets…how heavy are vets being hit in layoffs?

Curious if Vets have any job safety with all these layoffs?

by
| 1486 views | | 14 replies (last July 12, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1nyFHzgF

14 replies (most recent on top)

@trs+1nyFHzgF

Ok.

"'Vets' (a vast majority of whom never see a single day of combat) have that entitlement mentality."

There's no need to type 'Vets'...

vet·er·an, noun

  • -a person who has served in the military

The word does not suggest that the person was an active participant in combat, simply that they served in the military. Hence the phrase "combat vet" to distinguish those that have done so. No vets using the title are making false claims or inflating the relevance of their contribution.

In any event, what you fail to understand is that when you sign up to join you have no idea if there will be a war you'll be involved in or not. Many thousands of people joined in 1999 or 2000, with no clue whether they were in for 4 years of relative peace time (like the preceding 4 years) or 4 years of WW3. As it turned out they got something in the middle, with the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

"They want endless free things..."

Not a single person in this thread has asked for a single benefit due to vet status. Your stereotyping of people is willfully ignorant.

"...for walking around fences, digging holes, filling out paperwork, etc..."

You sound like you know alllll about what it's like being on active duty. Your disdain for the real work that is required to maintain a professional army is apparent. If there's a silver lining in the sh-t, it's that bullets/fragmentation don't care if you're an elitist snob or not.

"...on the taxpayer dime, with no actual benefit to the taxpayer."

Having a professional army saves untold numbers of lives when a war does kick off and you have a well trained/equipped force to deploy. Just throwing a bunch of guys at the enemy that have no idea what they are doing or how to use our military technology proficiently is a recipe for disaster.

"But yeah, keep shamelessly begging for more freebies."

...again, not a single person here has asked for anything. Stop making things up.

"What better way to show how the military made you strong than by grovelling for even more 'free' stuff your whole life."

Almost as strong as the guy compelled to anonymously attack a large group of people with stereotypes and ignorance from the safety of his basement. Almost.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bed+1nyFHzgF

Do you think Charlie cares about a vet? An employee on leave dying of cancer? A single parent with children? Now I if you are transgender he may think twice!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pah+1nyFHzgF

To the last two posters, instead of getting predictably crybaby-ish with your responses, how about something detailed to refute the post?

Or does the truth hurt?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @trs+1nyFHzgF

@hoy+1nyFHzgF

No one is asking for free stuff here, and vets aren't getting any special treatment when it comes to terms. Why don't you go ahead and show us on the doll where the bad vet touched you?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jbb+1nyFHzgF

Said like the true disrespectful tu-d you surely are…you obviously know nothing of service to anything/anyone other than yourself. I feel bad for the people who have to work with you.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fee+1nyFHzgF

'Vets' (a vast majority of whom never see a single day of combat) have that entitlement mentality. They want endless free things for walking around fences, digging holes, filling out paperwork, etc on the taxpayer dime, with no actual benefit to the taxpayer.

But yeah, keep shamelessly begging for more freebies. What better way to show how the military made you strong than by grovelling for even more 'free' stuff your whole life.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hoy+1nyFHzgF

They will no more keep nor target Veteran Employees as compared to any other class for employment. There are benefits employers get from local and federal Governments by employing Veterans but the gains do not outweigh any losses incurred by keeping a position filled by someone who doesn’t fulfill a need.

If they were to target Vets it would generate a lawsuit just like targeting any other class of employee. There is no more or less risk being a Vet at Wells.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @myw+1nyFHzgF

Everywhere I have been, H1B visa is the only protection against layoffs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lnt+1nyFHzgF

Post ID: @kau+1nyFHzgF they use to get like credits by hiring veterans, so companies preferred to do this bc it helped with fed contracts

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hsq+1nyFHzgF

It makes no difference. I'm sure HR looks at race, because firing "the wrong people" can lead to a lawsuit and political grandstanding, but otherwise there are no protected classes in terms.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xoy+1nyFHzgF

Why would you think your military vet status would protect you more than your fellow employees who are not military vets??

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vxd+1nyFHzgF

Why woyyou think your military vet status would protect you more than your fellow employees who are not military vets??

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kau+1nyFHzgF

The first 2 on our team to be laid off were Vets.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pin+1nyFHzgF

US or Indian Military Vets?
Liz Warren still thinks she's Indian, so in with Indians out with the Americans.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xyk+1nyFHzgF

Post a reply

: