Also no service degradation at their top plan? I can save 60-70 per month for the same service even with employee discount??? What employee discount I ask!!! To be or not to be, I don't want any part of ATT I see.
12 replies (most recent on top)
"Shameful to not use T products."
Wasteful (or just plain d-mb) not to use the company that gives the best value for your money..!!
Mint is probably the cheapest plan you are going to get in the world. If it works for you, go mint.
Agreed, if not a troll, then this poster should have been surplused a long time ago!
Shameful not to use T products? How about shameful the way employees are being treated for job location changes? There is no contract of employment, at the end of each pay period and you have been paid, then you and the employer owe each other nothing (of course exceptions are senior leadership who have employment contracts). There is no expectation that you use your pay to subsidize company revenue or an expectation that you buy the employer's products. I get that people may have loyalty to a company, but no company that I'm aware of lists their loyalty, or cradle to grave employment, for an employee. T is not a charity, it's purpose is to make money for the shareholders who invested their money and empowered management to make decisions to give them a return on their investment.
"Has to be a troll right?"
I don't think so. A lot of wireline lifers have no clue.
Worked on a reseller project called AIO (All In One) for ~2 years and we literally purchased Cricket at launch or shortly after launch of AIO. Scrapped! It was a difficult accomplishment to put on Amplify or whatever we used back then. Look what I did Boss!
Has to be a troll right? What employee is unaware that AT&T bought cricket years ago. If this was a genuine question, then that is one clueless employee that brought us all down. But I’m sure it’s a troll. Basic human nature not to give more to the person destroying your career.
Shameful to not use T products.
Overage should be identical. Only potential issue is “throttling”, under certain situations AT&T subs would take priority over Cricket ones, which are ranked second tier from a network perspective. In reality probably not something you would ever notice.
What makes you think At&t is going to give you more for less?
Fotr the love of God.
Cricket is solid, Metro PCS. Metro PCS has better and lower cost phones.
Yes. Cricket is literally AT&T, just by a different name. Cricket plans are different, but the back-end service is the same.