Consistently exceeds 5%
Exceeds 15%
Meets 60%
Inconsistently Meets 15%
Needs Improvement 5%
10 replies (most recent on top)
In corporate risk managers are expected to hit this distribution.
The issue is that for untold YEARS/DECADES people were getting the highest ratings possible for simply doing their job.
When everyone is special, no one is special.
Yeah they’ll give you an exceeds in a couple categories as like a Pat on the head but overall you’ll get a meets.
Performance reviews have honestly become a formality at this point. The biggest challenge is not talking yourself into more work in order to “grow”
If the 'guideline' is everyone gets meets, why even waste the time of going through the process?
Nevermind. Sometimes I forget that tormenting employees is always the #1 objective for Hudson Yards.
F their reviews and quotas!
That's a guideline. Many teams will not have higher then meets.
I've heard the exact same thing. Sounds like it's a corporate talking point.
Our leader has stated they do not expect any of us to self-rate at anything above a Meets as it is only mid year and we couldn’t have done anything that amazing in this amount of time.
Way to gaslight your employees further down into this h€LL hole.
My manage barely has 6 directs (1 or 2 are ALWAYS out on some kind of leave) so the ratio breakdowns absolutely track. It’s totally ridiculous in this day and age to grade on a curve, but here we are.🤦🏻♂️
There’s a quota for mid year? Is it by group?