Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

Industry Standard? Let’s Cut the BS.

As of November 2026, only 7.2% of Fortune 500 companies require employees in the office five days a week. Meanwhile, 44% maintain hybrid arrangements, with the rest offering some combination of remote and hybrid work. Flexibility increasingly depends on the job, team, and location.

And in telecommunications? AT&T is the outlier. Our competitors, the very companies we’re supposed to be competing against, are still largely remote, with limited hybrid requirements.

Since AT&T implemented its RTO mandates, we’ve gone from 1st to 3rd.

So where exactly is this supposed industry standard? Who are we benchmarking against? And what measurable business improvement are we getting in return?

Five days in the office isn’t an industry standard. It’s an AT&T leadership poision pill decision being passed off as one. Let’s stop pretending otherwise.

by
| 23 views | | 9 replies (last 6 hours ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1m7b81ftk

9 replies (most recent on top)

You get paid to come in to work. Just do it. All of this complaining is ridiculous.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c0+1m7b81ftk

“I am currently interviewing and the first offer I get, I’m gone.”

This is why we have so many employees with over 30 years. They never get other offers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bj+1m7b81ftk

I am mid 30s, I have no pension. I hate this company. I am currently interviewing and the first offer I get, I’m gone. Compensation here su-ks, culture su-ks, leadership su-ks. There’s really no reason to stay. Once all the olds retire out there will be a talent crisis as the young’s are in mass exodus. RTO will be the demise of this company and the bootlickers will be stuck doing the work of 3 people for bottom of the market pay. Ranked at the bottom on Forbes rankings for a reason.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b2+1m7b81ftk

What about the fortune 100? Factor out the tech giants who literally do tech that can be remote. AT&T isn’t fully RTO either as a lot of positions don’t come into the office. Stop crying and quit if it bothers you.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ah+1m7b81ftk

@a3 OP here, I’d take the severance and move on. Currently interviewing with other companies. So yeah, I’d gladly take the money and run. I don’t have a pension and I’m not stuck a couple more years. I’d be out

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ag+1m7b81ftk

@a3 , you sound like his cabin boy.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1m7b81ftk

@a3 most people here actually WANT to be laid off and that is because of John Stink. You’re a pathetic loser talking about another man this way. No wonder you’re still here.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1m7b81ftk

@a3 I’d kick stink right in the baldz while looking him straight in the eyes. Nobody respects that clown, let alone fears him. I welcome a layoff with severance. This is one of the worst companies in the world to work for. I will stick around doing the absolute bare minimum while collecting full paychecks, and if it makes you bootlickers and sycophants upset that’s just an added benefit.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1m7b81ftk

You’re lucky this forum is anonymous otherwise Stankey will have you begging for mercy. Those who complain usually cry the loudest when the layoff call is made.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1m7b81ftk

Post a reply

: