Thread regarding Citigroup Inc. / Citibank / Citi layoffs

This comment is the most accurate reflection of Citi's MD and D's that I have ever seen

It's taken from the wall street discriminates and reproduced below without any editing. Whoever wrote this, is absolutely bang on the money and most likely got managed out because had enough skillset and knowledge to be hired elsewhere, didn't need to k1ss @ss and for this reason was probably branded 'difficult to manage' and managed out. The last line is very telling of the present circumstances in a few different palaces in the US

Yes, indeed. Citi MDs are entitled, lazy, bossy, and selfish. For the uninformed reader, let me explain what that means.

Entitled. Citi MDs think the title is an anointment in recognition of their talent. It’s just the opposite. They were chosen for being the biggest followers of all, the ones who blindly implement imbecilic instructions from the top, ethics and right-doing be damned.

Lazy. Citi MDs (and directors) don’t do the work. They’re middle managers who relay orders without creating any value, a buffer between senior executives and the people doing the work.

Many insist you go through their EA just to get on their calendar. That process props up their sense of superiority and lets them dodge hard conversations and any accountability for giving you the runaround.

One Risk MD blamed her unresponsiveness on not having a Chief of Staff. Never mind that those roles were cut in the reorg, or that she was never senior enough to have one. It was a cop-out for poor time management, a skill she should have mastered as a VP.

Bossy. Citi MDs lack vision and subject-matter knowledge. They can’t inspire you or coach you on your work. They issue an edict and expect it to be carried out like gospel. They won’t follow up or notice you’re struggling. But once someone points a finger, they know exactly where to go to pile on.

Selfish. Citi MDs care about one thing: their next promotion. They create the illusion of success while adding no value to the bank.

Many of them are proud to call themselves “institutionalized.” That may be the best explanation for why transformation has failed. You can’t change how an organization works with the same people who embody the behaviors and mindsets that need to change.

When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn’t become a king. The palace becomes a circus. Truth.


by
| 71 views | | 5 replies (last 25 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1m4xsqj6j

5 replies (most recent on top)

Above all plus MDs and Directors should have people skills and minimum manners to say “Hi” or “ good morning “to a colleague

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @th+1m4xsqj6j

Half correct.

I get the part about MDs behaving like spoiled brats. I see it too so can vouch for that happening with some.

The rest is far-fetched. An MD isn't going to be the top level subject matter expert on literally everything the teams beneath them do. That's crazy. It's like saying because the CEO or the CRO aren't the pre-eminent authorities over literally all-things risk management, that they're not qualified to lead. No one knows everything. Most MDs get promoted because of a mix of interpersonal skills, their network, having well-rounded comprehensive knowledge in their field (even if they're not experts in everything) and have a track record of delivering results - which means a track record of managing teams that deliver results. They're not analysts, and one doesn't go from analyst to MD without proving one's ability to lead and deliver results first. They are supposed to be leaders in their field, but not pre-eminent authorities on everything and anything.

MDs absolutely should inspire people, foster a positive work environment within their teams, encourage and reward achievement, and make correct important decisions that require senior level review and approval. Any MDs that don't do these things aren't good MDs. I won't argue that for one second. And I know plenty of good MDs, mediocre MDs, and a few bad ones too.

If you think you're smart, and simply don't like the fact that someone who may not know as much as you about something, if sitting a few levels above you while getting paid more than you, su-k it up. They probably know lots of other things you don't, and in most cases earned their stripes before getting promoted. If they get lazy after getting promoted, they'll eventually get the boot. I've seen it happen many times.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @df+1m4xsqj6j

100%

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aq+1m4xsqj6j

nonsense.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @an+1m4xsqj6j

This should be no surprise. The “i” in Citi stands for “incompetence.”

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1m4xsqj6j

Post a reply

: