Thread regarding Oracle Corp. layoffs

Oracle Consumer Industries: Why the Disparity in Customer Success RIFs?

There is a question worth asking about the recent RIFs affecting Customer Success Managers across Oracle Consumer Industries:

Why does it appear that Hospitality CSMs are carrying a disproportionate share of the reductions compared with Food & Beverage?

The question becomes more interesting when you consider the nature of the two businesses.

Hotel technology particularly at the enterprise level is incredibly complex. A Hospitality CSM may be dealing with global hotel companies operating hundreds or thousands of properties, OPERA Cloud deployments, integrations, payments, distribution, loyalty, partners, escalations and major transformation programs.

These aren't simply account-management roles. The best Hospitality CSMs often become the connective tissue between the customer, Support, Development, Consulting, Sales, Product and executive leadership.

If Hospitality is also delivering stronger profitability and margins than F&B, as some believe, the disparity becomes even more difficult to understand. It would be useful to see the actual numbers.

And there is another question that probably needs to be asked:

Does the background of the current Consumer Industries leadership play any role in how Customer Success resources are being allocated?

With leadership experience coming from the F&B side of the business, could there naturally be greater familiarity with or a different view of the F&B Customer Success model and its staffing requirements?

That doesn't mean anyone is deliberately protecting one organization at the expense of another. Nor is this an argument that F&B CSMs should be losing their jobs instead.

It's a question about whether the two businesses are being evaluated using the right criteria.

If Hospitality has greater customer complexity, larger enterprise transformations, significant integration requirements and attractive margins, what is the business rationale for deeper reductions in Hospitality Customer Success?

Maybe there is a good answer.

But employees and customers deserve to understand the strategy.

What metrics are actually determining where the CSM reductions occur and are Hospitality and F&B truly being evaluated on an equivalent basis?


by
| 2 views | | 7 replies (last 5 hours ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1m37cg31j

7 replies (most recent on top)

@ep it should be the datacenters that should be slowed down and reduced.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hd+1m37cg31j

@ct selling business units actually makes sense. For all the engineers and managers there are armies of support, IT, HR etc involved. That’s a lot of expenditure

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ep+1m37cg31j

@bj That's why they have two CEOs, it's a brilliant idea by Larry for OCI and infrastructure. Performance obligations from OCI revenue will support building infrastructure. OCI needs restructuring and alignment that's why they are doing the layoffs. Selling off of business units to other companies will be a terrible idea, this will weeken the position of Oracle.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ct+1m37cg31j

What...? Food & Beverage and Hospitality are two different business units? Any strategist with brains would combine them.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cr+1m37cg31j

Strategy? lol

The truest thing is what they call their employee updates: Strategy Inaction! lmao

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c5+1m37cg31j

My guess is they are consolidating and getting ready to sell business units. I wouldn't be surprised if thats what they intend after the industry consolidation and reorg. My guess is Oracle actually wants to divest in what Mike, co-ceo, is working on. Leaves Clay alone to focus on OCI and infrastructure. Leaves Mike to focus on consolidation and eventual divestment from industries that aren't really essential like Hospitality and Utilities. More cap-ex for AI.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bj+1m37cg31j

Any further Reductions in operational roles, operation support roles, will make the ecosystem collapse. If they think Ai agents can resolve complex customer issues, thats the end of that business unit.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1m37cg31j

Post a reply

: