Thread regarding Fidelity Investments layoffs

‘Return To Work’

Anyone else catch this slip from Bill F at the all hands earlier?


by
| 64 views | | 10 replies (last 6 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1m2k7w3y3

10 replies (most recent on top)

Young people also have a lot fewer instances of $1M cancer treatments that the company pays for. There's a reason over 40 years old is a protected class.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pw+1m2k7w3y3

@cw - but they DO only want young people because they get paid less.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dp+1m2k7w3y3

@ag this has frequently been mentioned in news articles after the layoff earlier this year

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d5+1m2k7w3y3

They need to be careful making statements like they want to hire a bunch of young people. If they do layoffs that include too many older people, statements like that can be used in legal proceedings.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cw+1m2k7w3y3

I’m sure this pun got him one additional head pat from Abby. Keep poking fun at the g o y.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @am+1m2k7w3y3

@af they did publicly state after the more public layoff early this year they wanted "early career engineers". They want younger labor they can pay less than those who are higher up in pay brackets

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ag+1m2k7w3y3

What also struck me was that they're looking to 3x hiring young associates (leap / interns) . We already have space issues and calling out specifically that they're looking to hire young people sounded like age discrimination.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1m2k7w3y3

Oh that’s funny. I wasn’t on the call so I obviously didn’t hear it, but thanks for sharing

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1m2k7w3y3

Looks intentional use of words

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ab+1m2k7w3y3

He referred to it as "return to work" rather than office?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1m2k7w3y3

Post a reply

: