Thread regarding TIAA (TIAA-CREF) layoffs

Is Cash Still King ?

On September 1, 2026, a proposed class action, Powlen v. TIAA-CREF Individual & Institutional Services, LLC and TIAA Trust, N.A., Case No. 1:26-cv-07494, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint challenges TIAA’s automatic Bank Deposit Sweep Program for certain IRA customers.

The complaint alleges that eligible uninvested cash was automatically swept into FDIC-insured bank deposit accounts while a higher-yielding money market fund option was available through TIAA’s platform. It further alleges that TIAA’s agreements promised that swept deposits would bear a “reasonable rate of interest,” but the rates credited to customers remained materially below short-term market benchmarks and TIAA’s own higher-yielding alternatives.
What Does the Complaint Allege?
According to the complaint, TIAA’s bank sweep rate changed only modestly while short-term interest rates rose substantially. For example, the complaint alleges that by June 2023 the Federal Funds Rate was 5.08% while the TIAA sweep rate was 1.00%. It also alleges that TIAA displayed materially higher rates for certain managed, overflow and money market options while keeping eligible customers in the lower-yield bank sweep program.

The complaint alleges that TIAA and its affiliates benefited economically from swept customer cash and that TIAA’s compensation structure created incentives to use sweep options that generated greater compensation. Customers allegedly received less interest than they would have received if TIAA had paid a reasonable rate or used available higher-yielding options.


by
| 15 views | | 8 replies (last 6 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1m2jc5t78

8 replies (most recent on top)

@jg Big Ti-tty Lettity James

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sk+1m2jc5t78

@nq i’m not board. I am pis-sed.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sj+1m2jc5t78

If youre bored, look back 4 years in this board and see how well the other predictions from this board has done.

Heck, look back to January this year. How's that assurance of a change to 5 days in office doing?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nq+1m2jc5t78

@jg For the Greater Good

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @n6+1m2jc5t78

@ck Yep. They learned from the big SEC settlement in 2021. Crime pays. Letitia James quote says it all. They made hundreds of millions and paid back $97 million. So sadly....crime does pay for big financial firms with a culture willing to engage in it.
“TIAA made hundreds of millions of dollars misleading clients and pressuring them into higher-cost investments that picked away at tens of thousands of investors’ retirement accounts. TIAA relied on its reputation as a trusted and objective financial advisor to profit off of clients through fraudulent and manipulative sales practices. We’re finally making things right by returning $97 million back into investors’ pockets and locking TIAA into significant reforms to ensure this type of fraud never happens again. New Yorkers can always trust my office to go after corporate greed.”

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jg+1m2jc5t78

@fr that is truly criminal. No wonder we have a AAA rating for a couple of more years before the Schroeders deal becomes such a “noo.se” around TIAAs neck & the rating agency begins the downgrades.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @h6+1m2jc5t78

Not only that but for a long time (before they offered money markets as sweep accounts) they wouldn’t even allow you to buy and hold a money market as an investment.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fr+1m2jc5t78

@OP it's all about greed, smoke, mirrors, and how long it will take before people will notice it . The way C-Suite operates is "we'll be able to get away with it and even if they sue, we have made $40M & only have to pay out $5M in a settlement" & half of that amount is covered by an insurance policy. its the wolf of wall street

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ck+1m2jc5t78

Post a reply

: