Thread regarding Truist Bank layoffs

An Open Letter to Mike Lyons: Listen to Your Teammates

Dear Mike,

Welcome! Before any process is addressed, the people responsible for carrying out that process must be heard, valued, and respected. That principle should be at the heart of Truist’s culture. Reconsider the Return-to-Office (RTO) mandate and give teammates the flexibility to choose how they work.

The majority of Truist teammates want the company to succeed. They want to serve clients well, perform at a high level, and contribute to the future of this organization. But too often, teammates feel that their voices are not being heard when major workplace decisions are made. Truist frequently emphasizes the “Voice of the Client.” But what about the voice of the teammate?

A company cannot consistently put clients first while overlooking the people who serve those clients every day. Allow teammates to choose how they work. Optional remote or a two-day-per-week hybrid expectation would be welcomed by many who simply want flexibility, trust, and the ability to balance work with the realities of today's economy.

If a teammate desires to be in-office everyday -- let them!
If a teammate desires to be hybrid 2-days a week OR more -- let them!
If a teammate desires to remote OR work from home -- let them!

Give teammates the freedom to choose how they work best.
Trust them. Measure their performance by their results, productivity, collaboration, and client impact — not simply by where they sit.

Gas prices and the cost of living continue to put enormous pressure on working families. At the same time, many teammates feel that salaries and bonuses have not kept pace with those rising costs. Requiring employees to spend more time and money commuting—without meaningful flexibility or compensation—only adds to that burden.

This should be a priority, Mike. Listen to your teammates. Respect your teammates. Trust your teammates. If Truist wants teammates to demonstrate commitment to the company, the company must demonstrate that same commitment to its people.

And where is HR in all of this?

There is a growing perception that HR is disconnected from the sentiments, concerns, and undercurrents among the very teammates it is supposed to support. Leadership needs an honest, unfiltered understanding of what employees are experiencing—not simply what is being reported through formal channels.

The solution is not complicated: Ask teammates what they want. Listen to what they say. And then act on it. Give people choices.

Trust high-performing professionals to determine where and how they can do their best work. Measure employees by their results, client service, collaboration, and performance—not simply by the number of days they sit in an office.

Mike, Truist has an opportunity to demonstrate that it truly values its people. Make flexibility a priority. Make listening a priority. Make the Voice of the Teammate every bit as important as the Voice of the Client.

Let teammates choose how they work.


by
| 207 views | | 35 replies (last 5 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1m27a9w8e

35 replies (most recent on top)

RTO will be revisited. Matter of time.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hq+1m27a9w8e

It's pretty simple. RTO should be based on the following:

  • Client-facing role. If you are client-facing, you are likely to be in the office. I know some folks don't, but generally you do.
  • Manager level. If you are a manager, get your butt in the office. It is obscene for a manager to WFH. If you're serious about climbing the ladder and making the higher salary, you have to make this sacrifice.
  • Service years. People with less than 5 years come into the office 5 days a week but have occasional flexibility for things like contractors coming to your home, etc. At 5-10 years, you get 1 day a week RTO, at 10-15 you get 2, at 15-20 it's 3 days RTO, 20+ should be allowed 4-5 days RTO. Of course, this does not apply if you are client-facing or a manager.

These guidelines are easy to apply and eliminates the inconsistency I have seen with RTO. Our group are dragons about it and pester you if you are 1 day at home and didn't clear it first.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @14g+1m27a9w8e

Really, RTO is still a topic. I’d axe you if you aren’t there every day.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vg+1m27a9w8e

It is ridiculous to think that Lyons would make any RTO change on Day 2. It is equally ridiculous to think that because he did not change RTO on Day 2 that means he simply doesn't care. Bill is still on the BOD, though that may be mostly ceremonial. If any RTO change is made, it may not be until Bill is gone. If some facility prep work is pending, MAYBE that will be put on hold. Real estate is an expense, but Lyons needs to come up with a comprehensive plan for the BOD to approve likely before Christmas. And we have no idea what those plans will be. Analysts are expecting something bold, not minor tweaks.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jy+1m27a9w8e

@dt that’s for the corporation, not the employees. Slippery slope you’re on: by that logic they could mandate what you drive, wear, eat, and do in your spare time.

“We need everyone to live within 25% of the range of your electric car, wear cotton clothing and keep your thermostat at 76 in the summer/ 65 in the winter. We missed our earnings forecast and uh, “sorta need to play catch up” on the net-zero thing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @g5+1m27a9w8e

@br either you replied to the wrong post or you need to understand what “projecting” is. The poster is exactly right… HR is there to protect the company. Just like your insurance company is not your friend in an accident, HR is not your advocate for what you wish were true. They’re like the courts: interpreting policy and handling disagreements. And guess who always wins….

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @g4+1m27a9w8e

@b7 it’s called capitalism. Check it out.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @g3+1m27a9w8e

I hope the media asks how the RTO mandate supports with Truist's published substainability goals???

Net-Zero Goal: Achieve net-zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2050. Operational Emissions: Reduce Scope 1 and Scope 2 operational GHG emissions by 35% by 2030.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dt+1m27a9w8e

@cc I'm not d-mb enough to name it here but I work there lol

It doesn't take much effort to find them. It's pretty easy lol

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dp+1m27a9w8e

I agree with you, but sadly I don’t think he gives a f. He was asked if he would reconsider the RTO policy during his first town hall, and he flat out said no.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dn+1m27a9w8e

@da most aren’t actually

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @db+1m27a9w8e

I really hope RTO is revisited. Most teammates are grown, professional adults capable of managing their work schedules and locations.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @da+1m27a9w8e

@ca

do you really consider corporate simping as "doing your job"? 🤣🤣🤣

I swear, you bootlickers get d-mber by the day...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ce+1m27a9w8e

@cc

it would make bootlickers like you too happy. we aren't having that...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cd+1m27a9w8e

@cb please name a bank whose positions are entirely remote. And btw, why don’t you go work there?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cc+1m27a9w8e

@a5 a lot of other companies don't. There are plenty of banks out there where nearly all positions are remote.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cb+1m27a9w8e

@a5 because the little whiners don’t understand or weren’t brought up to get that the world doesn’t revolve around them. They want to throw a temper tantrum and things to go the way they demand. This all while the rest of us sit at our desks and do our job.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ca+1m27a9w8e

@a2 and you need to grow up

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c9+1m27a9w8e

Not gonna happen

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c8+1m27a9w8e

Hate to tell you, but he not only doesn’t care, but her isn’t going to read that.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c7+1m27a9w8e

You really took the time to write this. You probably fill out the employee survey form too, thinking someone is going to have sympathy. Your best bet is to start applying to remote jobs because they are only here to make their lives easier and their bonuses bigger, not yours.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c3+1m27a9w8e

While I don’t necessarily disagree with this, it is AI slop.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bs+1m27a9w8e

@b8

Does it make you all tingly to be submissive and servile to men in positions of power? Ick.

Keep your sick fetishes off this board...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @br+1m27a9w8e

@a5

You are not particularly bright, are you?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bp+1m27a9w8e

@a8 go find another job. even a plumber cannot choose work location at his will. no bank in this country has "work wherever as you want" in this country. literally, none.

why woud truist want to do that?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bm+1m27a9w8e

HR 100% exist to protect the company. Not your "work from home life"

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b8+1m27a9w8e

@b1 Drinking he corporate purple kool-aid

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b7+1m27a9w8e

@ac YES. He’s not paid to have a heart; he’s paid to drive shareholder value. If remote work was a successful it would have stayed in place. He is charged with raising the stock price; that’s it. I’m pretty sure he’d respond to this letter with, “leave your corporate assets in your desk as you leave today”.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b1+1m27a9w8e

Cute to think he will see this, much less read it. It’s a nice “dear diary” entry but from what I’ve heard about him you’re screaming at the sky.
He is not accountable to employees. He is accountable to shareholders. The very statement that “we have been successfully working remotely for years” vs the whole reason he was hired deserves a look.
TFC has not been successful and needs a change. Welcome to a new era and “please let me work as I want” falls on deaf ears.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b0+1m27a9w8e

First, I'm not reading all that. Second, you can't appeal to the heart of any executive in Corporate America because they are heartless.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1m27a9w8e

@a5 YES, A RIGID RTO MANDATE IS A BIG DEAL. IT IS NOT NECESSARY FOR SUCCESS.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1m27a9w8e

@a5 The focus isn’t whether other companies have RTO policies too. Other companies also have flexibility via hybrid and remote options! Teammates are asking for greater flexibility and relief from rigid RTO mandates. Many banking roles can be performed effectively remotely, and employees have demonstrated that for years.

Flexibility doesn’t mean eliminating the office. It means recognizing that a one-size-fits-all mandate may not make sense for every role, team, or teammate. IF BEING IN-OFFICE EVERYDAY WORKS FOR YOU, THEN DO THAT. The fact that other companies may require RTO doesn’t mean employees shouldn’t advocate for better workplace options.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1m27a9w8e

RTO again...

WHY IS IT SUCH A BIG DEAL? OTHER COMPANIES HAVE RTO AS WELL.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1m27a9w8e

I’d really welcome this type of flexibility. I’d probably opt to rotate the weeks. One week in the office, one week remote. I love the idea of giving teammates the autonomy to choose where and how they work best. It's a great way to support different working styles while still creating opportunities to connect in person. What works for me, may not work for another teammate and vice-versa.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1m27a9w8e

This! I'm paying way too much for gas and sitting in horrible ATL traffic everyday. It is not sustainable. This needs to be revisited asap!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1m27a9w8e

Post a reply

: