Done — tlo-dump-2026-09-09/ is created in /Users/trieste/Desktop/VSCode/temp/ with four files:
File Grain Rows
thread.csv thread/OP + board-level counters 1
posts.csv one row per post (OP + 43 replies) 44
autotags.csv one row per tag (long format) 5
README.md schema, validation, assumptions —
How the data got categorized. Three grains rather than one flat file: thread-level counters (views, reply count, last-reply date) belong to the thread, not to any post, and the five AutoTags are a repeating group, so they went long instead of being crammed into one cell. posts.csv splits every composite the site renders as prose: @cy+1kt0n0jhf → post_id + post_ref; 23 reactions (+21/-2) → reactions_total, upvotes, downvotes, net_score; the leading @xx mention → reply_to_ref, which reconstructs the reply tree (30 of 43 replies point at a parent, 13 are top-level). Added author_type (38 anonymous, 5 pseudonymous, 1 named) and position, renumbered oldest-first since the site displays newest-first.
Validation. 43 replies + OP = 44 rows, matching the site's counter; every row satisfies reactions_total == up + down and net_score == up − down; no duplicate IDs; CSV round-trips back to 44 rows despite multi-line bodies.
Three things worth knowing:
No year in the source. Dates are verbatim strings (May 31 … June 7), not typed dates — I didn't guess a year. Sort by position for chronological order.
Views differ between your two inputs: text says 528949, screenshot says 528950. I used the text value; it's a live counter.
One dangling reference: post @jg opens with @hjn, and no post hjn exists in the thread. Stored verbatim rather than silently corrected to hj — say the word if you'd rather it be normalized.
Post bodies are stored exactly as published, including the site's censor-masking (sh!t, mo--ns).
now create a markdown file that will help me archive the main thread and all reply data. do not use ** to bold. bullets are ok. hashtags are not
Checked for hash characters in post bodies
No # anywhere in the post bodies, so the only hashtags would be the AutoTags — I'll render those as plain words. Generating the archive from the CSVs so it stays consistent with the data:
Ran 3 commands
Sent
Full thread archive — OP, all 43 replies, reply tree, and index. No bold markers, no hashtags.
md
thread-archive.md
27kB
Created thread-archive.md (584 lines) inside the dump folder. Generated from the CSVs rather than retyped, so it can't drift from the data.
Seven sections:
Archive header — source, thread ID, capture date, post count, activity window, companion files
Thread record — title, board, author, views, reactions, reply count, AutoTags
Original post — full text, blockquoted
Archive summary — 772 total reactions (+544/−228), replies per day, top upvoted and downvoted posts, most replied-to posts
Conversation structure — indented reply tree reconstructed from the @ mentions, deepest chain running c2 → c3 → cy → d7 → ra → xm across five days
Reply index — table of all 43 replies with ID, date, author, parent, vote split
Full reply text — every reply oldest-first, each with its metadata bullets and verbatim body
Archival notes — the year gap, the view-count drift, the dangling hjn reference, what was excluded
On your two formatting rules: no ** anywhere, and no # character at all — verified by assertion before the file was written. Headings use setext underlines (=== and ---), which are real markdown headings that render as H1/H2 without hash marks, so you keep document structure and a working outline in any viewer. The five AutoTags are written as plain words (RTO, ReturnToOffice, Forum, ELT, Quitting) since their normal form would have introduced hashtags; there's a parenthetical noting that. The post bodies happened to contain no # at all, so nothing in the quoted text needed altering.
Two small things I decided rather than asked:
Replies run oldest-first, opposite the site's display order, so the conversation reads forward. Position numbers match the position column in posts.csv, so both files cross-reference cleanly.
Post jg is shown at the bottom of the tree as a separate root, annotated as replying to hjn, which doesn't exist in the thread — rather than quietly attaching it to hj.
do the same with this: TheLayoff.com (→ www.thelayoff.com)Latest Posts (→ www.thelayoff.com)Privacy (→ www.thelayoff.com)
0
Shares
0
0
0
0
0
Thread regarding Paramount Global (→ www.thelayoff.com) layoffs
+14
94% Business Multiplier for STIP is SO PATHETIC
That's all I have to say. I'm so dissapointed in this sh---y company.
#Company (→ www.thelayoff.com)
February 27 by Anonymous
| 59899 views | 16 reactions (+15/-1) | 48 replies (last March 5) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @OP+1kjfx8m00
48 replies (most recent on top)
Older replies (→ www.thelayoff.com)
+1
@sv (→ www.thelayoff.com) Maybe as important, they don't want to compete.
March 5 by Anonymous
| 1 reaction (+1/-0) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @153+1kjfx8m00
+3
@c0 (→ www.thelayoff.com) I right we should be honored to have the privilege to be allowed to work here (some for many years) while we watch the company go down the po---r due to continued mismanagement and poor exec leadership. He-l maybe we should all pay paramount for letting us work here while the workload just increases and increases.
March 5 by Anonymous
| 3 reactions (+3/-0) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @14c+1kjfx8m00
+8
@sf (→ www.thelayoff.com) they can't poach from silicon valley unless they seriously change their compensation. i just left, saw my backfill will be paid similar to what i was getting, but my new job is giving me ~2x. company can't afford to be competitive
March 2 by Anonymous
| 8 reactions (+8/-0) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @sv+1kjfx8m00
+5
Plan is to start lowering expectations. New and future employees will mind the lower stip less than old timers — who they hope will leave. Totally not fair but probably their thinking. Don’t be surprised if in the future the stip and comp is different for the types they need to poach from Silicon Valley. They have no reason to retain marketing finance ops legal and content folks they can find anywhere since the studio world is shrinking. I don’t wish this on us but it seems to be where it’s all going
March 2 by Nostradamus dame
| 5 reactions (+5/-0) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @sf+1kjfx8m00
+17
Although I get those who condemn some of us for complaining about the STIP, It was negotiated as part of our pay structure. The last year was a sh-t show with layoffs and restructuring. The least the Company could do is give 100%. Just another reason to look elsewhere. The rest of this year is going to be another disaster with imminent consolidation and layoffs coming. The time is now to get out with a job in hand.
March 2 by Anonymous
| 17 reactions (+17/-0) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @qf+1kjfx8m00
+13
Confirmed…showed up in SAP a little while ago. 94% is better than nothing but I am
still disappointed. Oh well at least Netflix got their $2,800,000,000 Friday right? RIGHT?
March 2 by Anonymous
| 15 reactions (+14/-1) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @qb+1kjfx8m00
+17
This WBD merger is not a good thing. More layoffs…on both sides. Also more changes to legacy programs…STIP. Those that are left…bide your time until you get a package.
March 1 by Anonymous
| 19 reactions (+18/-1) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @k6+1kjfx8m00
0
Sorry. We don't speak lotto
March 1 by Lotto
| 2 reactions (+1/-1) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @je+1kjfx8m00
+16
Terrible Toxic Energy in this group. Try to be kind and compassionate. There is too much negative already from the top. The whole point of this group is to help people navigate through it, especially with more rounds layoffs coming…
February 28 by Anonymous
| 18 reactions (+17/-1) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @gz+1kjfx8m00
-4
@e9 (→ www.thelayoff.com) You're probably a bottom dweller who never accomplished much in life. No wonder you're such a loser.
February 28 by Anonymous
| 12 reactions (+4/-8) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @gq+1kjfx8m00
+2
@c0 (→ www.thelayoff.com) You're a bootlicking POS loser. GFY.
February 28 by Anonymous
| 8 reactions (+5/-3) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @gp+1kjfx8m00
+4
@fn (→ www.thelayoff.com) Fu--ing liar.
February 28 by Anonymous
| 6 reactions (+5/-1) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @gn+1kjfx8m00
+9
@fn (→ www.thelayoff.com) um no. Last wed was a regular payday for salary. The stip payout (if eligible, which is part of compensation package for some/many employees) is on 3/9. It is an “extra” payout not part of regular bi-weekly (if on that schedule) pay structure
February 28 by Anonymous
| 9 reactions (+9/-0) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @ft+1kjfx8m00
+9
@fn (→ www.thelayoff.com) Wrong
February 28 by Anonymous
| 9 reactions (+9/-0) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @fq+1kjfx8m00
-21
@b4 (→ www.thelayoff.com) payout was this past Wednesday. Maybe you are not getting a STIP payout.
February 28 by Anonymous
| 21 reactions (+0/-21) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @fn+1kjfx8m00
+31
@e9 (→ www.thelayoff.com) I am not going to apologize for being bonus eligible, which is part of my compensation package. I worked extremely hard to get to a level where I received this. And while I am very grateful, I am still allowed to be annoyed about the sh*tty business choices leadership is making
February 28 by Anonymous
| 33 reactions (+32/-1) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @fa+1kjfx8m00
+14
it takes just one or 2 d-mb exec decisions to wipe profitability away. So they cover up for it with layoffs and playing with the bonuses. Thats what this all is.
February 28 by Buffet table
| 14 reactions (+14/-0) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @f8+1kjfx8m00
-9
@ez (→ www.thelayoff.com) you’re a loser.
February 28 by Anonymous
| 13 reactions (+2/-11) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @f4+1kjfx8m00
+5
@c0 (→ www.thelayoff.com) you’re and id--t and a bootlicker
February 28 by Anonymous
| 11 reactions (+8/-3) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @ez+1kjfx8m00
+10
@ap (→ www.thelayoff.com) as someone who was just laid off and is still looking for work, I can assure you unemployment is better than working in that abusive work environment It. I at least have peace now and can freelance in the interim
February 28 by Anonymous
| 10 reactions (+10/-0) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @ey+1kjfx8m00
-5
How many people are actually involved with STIP that it warrants countless boring posts for the rest of us. It is what it is, which is beyond anybody's control . Deal with it and spare the rest of us already
February 28 by Anonymous
| 7 reactions (+1/-6) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @ex+1kjfx8m00
+21
@ec (→ www.thelayoff.com) i'm sure people would be more inclined to help make a profit if they were paying well enough.
either increase the salaries to be industry standard or allow continued remote work. it's not that difficult to understand.
February 28 by Anonymous
| 21 reactions (+21/-0) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @ed+1kjfx8m00
-16
@OP (→ www.thelayoff.com) this is a statement from nepo and his uncle Jeff that the days of free spending are over. You want full bonus? Help us make a profit.
February 28 by Anonymous
| 16 reactions (+0/-16) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @ec+1kjfx8m00
-16
Not everyone in the company gets a bonus, so with that in mind, have some gratitude for something where thousands of people were let go, and mulitple upcoming rounds coming up…
February 28 by Anonymous
| 26 reactions (+5/-21) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @e9+1kjfx8m00
+2
@c0 (→ www.thelayoff.com) cry harder
February 27 by Anonymous
| 8 reactions (+5/-3) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @c8+1kjfx8m00
+17
This absolutely su-ks. they overpay for ufc and duffer bros. Buy bari Weiss business and get rid of Taylor sheridan. Now they overpaid for wbd. We won’t see 100% again. Not to mention that if you get any stock options, the ownership basically has no interest in seeing the stock go up.
February 27 by G gecko
| 19 reactions (+18/-1) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @c2+1kjfx8m00
+20
@c0 (→ www.thelayoff.com) hate it when i feel "entitled" to (checks notes) compensation that is an explicit condition of my employment. kys
February 27 by Anonymous
| 24 reactions (+22/-2) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @c1+1kjfx8m00
-26
I cannot believe the level of discourse I see in comments on this site… are you people actually my fellow coworkers? Are you adults who have ever had a real job before? The entitlement is incredible.
February 27 by Anonymous
| 38 reactions (+6/-32) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @c0+1kjfx8m00
+1
@bx (→ www.thelayoff.com) su-k Ellison’s pedo di-k. This remote worker is going to enjoy his almost one year of full severance while you continue licking maga boots.
February 27 by Anonymous
| 23 reactions (+12/-11) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @bz+1kjfx8m00
+17
@bx (→ www.thelayoff.com) Who said anything about remote workers? Newsflash partner, most of us are back in an office. And I feel entitled to complain specifically because of that, thank you very much.
February 27 by Anonymous
| 19 reactions (+18/-1) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @by+1kjfx8m00
-26
You are pathetic. Don’t complain. You are lucky to be getting anything. You remote workers are so entitled. Get another job…don’t let the door hit you on the way out.
February 27 by Anonymous
| 30 reactions (+2/-28) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @bx+1kjfx8m00
+26
@b9 (→ www.thelayoff.com) Dude, this is an online gossip site. Literally every post is people ranting.
February 27 by Anonymous
| 28 reactions (+27/-1) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @bb+1kjfx8m00
-22
Dude, this is not the place for venting. If you are so upset and so resentful about your employer, you have the free will to seek a better employment. You realize that not everyone under paramount global is eligible for STIP right?
February 27 by Anonymous
| 40 reactions (+9/-31) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @b9+1kjfx8m00
+4
@b4 (→ www.thelayoff.com) Thank you!
February 27 by Anonymous
| 4 reactions (+4/-0) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @b5+1kjfx8m00
+14
@b3 (→ www.thelayoff.com) Email went out to people leaders this morning. My manager shared my comp statement with me. You should get an email on Monday letting you know your statement is available. Payout date is 3/9.
February 27 by Anonymous
| 14 reactions (+14/-0) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @b4+1kjfx8m00
+7
How did you find out? I’m looking under success factors and I don’t see a letter and no word from my boss.
February 27 by Anonymous
| 7 reactions (+7/-0) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @b3+1kjfx8m00
+12
@ap (→ www.thelayoff.com) they have always paid us less knowing part of the compensation is coming from STIP. yet there is still 2.8B to give to Netlfx for them backing out the sinking ship that is purchasing WBD.
February 27 by Anonymous
| 14 reactions (+13/-1) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @ar+1kjfx8m00
+17
@ap (→ www.thelayoff.com) I agree and I am definitely grateful, but watching $3.2 billion waltz out the door into Netflix’s hand of Nepo Baby’s tantrums is definitely hard to stomach.
February 27 by Anonymous
| 19 reactions (+18/-1) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @aq+1kjfx8m00
+12
Not to be a party po---r but based on the job market and knowing co-workers that were laid off previously that still have not found gigs, I would say, this is better than nothing.
Yes, it su-ks that we feel short changed but bonus is a bonus (meaning not guaranteed) and given the market, I would be grateful that we still have a bonus.
February 27 by Anonymous
| 24 reactions (+18/-6) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @ap+1kjfx8m00
+15
God knows if they will even continue the STIP going forward. What a joke.
February 27 by Anonymous
| 15 reactions (+15/-0) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @ae+1kjfx8m00
Older replies (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post a reply
Reply text (required)
Your name or pseudonym (optional)
Follow this thread
Use of this website constitutes acceptance of our Content Rules (→ www.thelayoff.com), User Agreement (→ www.thelayoff.com) and Privacy Policy (→ www.thelayoff.com)
© 2009-2026 TheLayoff.com Inc. (→ www.thelayoff.com) All rights reserved. Contact (→ www.thelayoff.com)----48 replies (most recent on top)
Newer replies (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Jesus Christ. This company hit or exceeded all of the metrics old Paramount set for the STIP calculations and they still short us? It could be worse but also could be so much better. You would think they would set a higher % so they could get bigger bonuses too
February 27 by Anonymous
| 10 reactions (+9/-1) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @aa+1kjfx8m00
Honestly, with yesterday‘s news, I expected it to be lower. It’s probably a good thing all of that broke after the multiplier was already decided.. With $2.8 billion going to Netflix for the break up fee, I don’t even wanna guess what next year’s STIP will look like. They will probably do away with the program altogether and just tell us to be lucky we have a job at all. Our real bonus is all that great in person collaboration we’re getting by being back in the office. F*k this sht.
February 27 by Anonymous
| 19 reactions (+19/-0) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @a9+1kjfx8m00
@a5 (→ www.thelayoff.com) i already resigned, just sitting here to collect my bonus since i was employed 12/31 :)
February 27 by Anonymous
| 8 reactions (+8/-0) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @a8+1kjfx8m00
Our bonus money went to Netflix because apparently they were the “smartest guys in the room” and we’re the ones funding the victory lap.
February 27 by Anonymous
| 17 reactions (+16/-1) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @a7+1kjfx8m00
@OP (→ www.thelayoff.com) so how many people are still resigning in March?
February 27 by Anonymous
| 6 reactions (+6/-0) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @a5+1kjfx8m00
Absolutely pathetic. They fire a ton of people and everyone else has to pick up the work. They give terrible raises to everyone and forced them back into an office five days a week like it’s 1985. Then they do this. This place su-ks.
February 27 by Anonymous
| 21 reactions (+20/-1) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @a4+1kjfx8m00
This is a joke. 94% is pathetic and everyone knows it.
Leadership can keep saying “we’re winning” but it’s just noise.
We paid Netflix as part of the WBD deal because they lost. We can write cheques like that, but we cannot pay our own people properly. That tells you everything
Stop spinning. Stop gaslighting. Pay people properly or stop acting surprised when morale is in the gutter
“Let’s go” where exactly? Into another year of excuses.
February 27 by C SuiteSmokescreen
| 19 reactions (+18/-1) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @a3+1kjfx8m00
Dog sh-t. What an embarrassing place to work. Don’t worry as leadership mentioned we are winning and the public knows it.
Let’s Go!!!!!
February 27 by Pissedoff
| 14 reactions (+13/-1) | Reply (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post ID: @a2+1kjfx8m00
Newer replies (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Post a reply
Reply text (required)
Your name or pseudonym (optional)
Follow this thread
Use of this website constitutes acceptance of our Content Rules (→ www.thelayoff.com), User Agreement (→ www.thelayoff.com) and Privacy Policy (→ www.thelayoff.com)
© 2009-2026 TheLayoff.com Inc. (→ www.thelayoff.com) All rights reserved. Contact (→ www.thelayoff.com)
Second thread, different company and 48 replies across two pages. Building it the same way:
Built Paramount thread CSVs
49 rows, 40 + 8 across the two source pages, all vote math reconciles, no dangling references this time. Now the archive file — I generalized the generator so it reads whichever dump folder it's pointed at:
Ran 3 commands
Now the README for this dump:
Ran 2 commands
Sent
Paramount Global STIP thread — OP, all 48 replies across both source pages, reply tree, and index.
md
thread-archive.md
29.3kB
Done — tlo-dump-2026-09-10/ with the same four files: thread.csv, posts.csv, autotags.csv, README.md, plus thread-archive.md (689 lines).
One thing to flag: I put this in a new folder rather than the 09-09 one. The clock rolled past midnight mid-session, the CSVs inside are single-thread by name (thread.csv, posts.csv) so they'd have collided, and captured_on genuinely differs. Say the word if you'd rather have one folder per batch and I'll restructure both into thread-named subfolders.
Validation: 48 replies + OP = 49 rows matching the site counter; page split reconciles at 40 + 8; every reaction split satisfies total == up + down; every reply_to_ref resolves to a real post — no dangling reference this time.
This source carried metadata the Edward Jones one didn't, so five columns were added rather than discarded:
source_page — the replies came from two paginated pages. Both captured, merged into one chronological sequence, origin page kept in the data and in the index table.
post_url, thread_url, op_post_url, company_slug — permalinks following the /p/@id+thread pattern the site uses in its own mention links. Derived for all posts, noted as such in the README.
Two judgment calls worth knowing:
Posts @ec and @a5 open with @OP, so reply_to_ref is OP and they attach directly to the original post in the tree. They still count as top level, since they answer no reply.
The +N vote badges appear beside page 1 replies but not page 2 in your paste. They're redundant with net_score, which is computed for all 49 posts.
The formatting rules hold: zero ** and zero # characters in the archive, asserted before write. The one AutoTag on this thread is rendered as the plain word Company, and headings again use setext underlines. The generator now reads whichever dump folder it's pointed at, so a third thread is quick.
Content-wise the thread splits cleanly into a compensation grievance about the 94% STIP multiplier against the Netflix breakup fee, and a running fight over whether complaining is warranted — c0 drew 5 direct replies at net −26, b9 and bx similar, while the sharpest rebuttals (fa at +31, bb at +26) sit at the top of the vote range.
TheLayoff.com archive: Paramount Global, "94% Business Multiplier for STIP is SO PATHETIC"
Complete capture of one thread: the original post plus all 48 replies, with vote counts, reply relationships, and full post text preserved verbatim.
Source: TheLayoff.com, board: Thread regarding Paramount Global layoffs
Thread address: https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1kjfx8m00
Thread ID: 1kjfx8m00 (shared suffix of every post ID in the thread)
Captured: 2026-09-10
Posts archived: 49 (1 original post, 48 replies)
Activity window: February 27 through March 5, year not stated by the source
Source pagination: replies spanned 2 pages on the site, recombined here into one sequence
Companion data files: thread.csv, posts.csv, autotags.csv, README.md
Thread record
Post title: 94% Business Multiplier for STIP is SO PATHETIC
Board: Thread regarding Paramount Global layoffs
Author: Anonymous
Posted: February 27
Views: 59,899
Reactions: 16 total, +15 / -1, net +14
Replies: 48, last on March 5
AutoTags: Company (rendered without the leading tag symbol)
Post ID: @OP+1kjfx8m00
Post address: https://www.thelayoff.com/p/@OP+1kjfx8m00
Original post
Posted February 27 by Anonymous, post ID @OP+1kjfx8m00.
That's all I have to say. I'm so dissapointed in this sh---y company.
Archive summary
Volume and engagement
Reactions across all 49 posts: 760 (+541 / -219, net +322)
Replies that answer another post: 26; replies that open a new line of discussion: 22
Distinct bylines among replies: 7 (42 posts signed Anonymous, 6 under a pseudonym)
Posts drawing more downvotes than upvotes: 9
Replies per day
February 27: 24
February 28: 16
March 1: 2
March 2: 4
March 5: 2
Most upvoted replies
@fa+1kjfx8m00 (February 28), net +31 from 33 reactions
@bb+1kjfx8m00 (February 27), net +26 from 28 reactions
@ed+1kjfx8m00 (February 28), net +21 from 21 reactions
Most downvoted replies
@c0+1kjfx8m00 (February 27), net -26 from 38 reactions
@bx+1kjfx8m00 (February 27), net -26 from 30 reactions
@b9+1kjfx8m00 (February 27), net -22 from 40 reactions
Most replied-to posts
c0 drew 5 direct replies (Anonymous)
ap drew 3 direct replies (Anonymous)
fn drew 3 direct replies (Anonymous)
OP drew 2 direct replies (the original post)
Conversation structure
Indentation shows who answered whom, derived from the leading mention in each post body. Numbers in parentheses are the reply position in chronological order.
OP, February 27, Anonymous
a2 (1, February 27, net +12)
a3 (2, February 27, net +17)
a4 (3, February 27, net +19)
a5 (4, February 27, net +6)
a8 (6, February 27, net +8)
a7 (5, February 27, net +15)
a9 (7, February 27, net +19)
aa (8, February 27, net +8)
ae (9, February 27, net +15)
ap (10, February 27, net +12)
aq (11, February 27, net +17)
ar (12, February 27, net +12)
ey (29, February 28, net +10)
b3 (13, February 27, net +7)
b4 (14, February 27, net +14)
b5 (15, February 27, net +4)
fn (34, February 28, net -21)
fq (35, February 28, net +9)
ft (36, February 28, net +9)
gn (37, February 28, net +4)
b9 (16, February 27, net -22)
bb (17, February 27, net +26)
bx (18, February 27, net -26)
by (19, February 27, net +17)
bz (20, February 27, net +1)
c0 (21, February 27, net -26)
c1 (22, February 27, net +20)
c8 (24, February 27, net +2)
ez (30, February 28, net +5)
f4 (31, February 28, net -9)
gp (38, February 28, net +2)
14c (47, March 5, net +3)
c2 (23, February 27, net +17)
e9 (25, February 28, net -16)
fa (33, February 28, net +31)
gq (39, February 28, net -4)
ec (26, February 28, net -16)
ed (27, February 28, net +21)
ex (28, February 28, net -5)
f8 (32, February 28, net +14)
gz (40, February 28, net +16)
je (41, March 1, net 0)
k6 (42, March 1, net +17)
qb (43, March 2, net +13)
qf (44, March 2, net +17)
sf (45, March 2, net +5)
sv (46, March 2, net +8)
153 (48, March 5, net +1)
Reply index
All 48 replies, oldest first. Position numbers match the position column in posts.csv.
No. Post ID Date Author In reply to Reactions Net Page
1 @a2+1kjfx8m00 February 27 Pissedoff top level 14 (+13 / -1) +12 2
2 @a3+1kjfx8m00 February 27 C SuiteSmokescreen top level 19 (+18 / -1) +17 2
3 @a4+1kjfx8m00 February 27 Anonymous top level 21 (+20 / -1) +19 2
4 @a5+1kjfx8m00 February 27 Anonymous OP 6 (+6 / 0) +6 2
5 @a7+1kjfx8m00 February 27 Anonymous top level 17 (+16 / -1) +15 2
6 @a8+1kjfx8m00 February 27 Anonymous a5 8 (+8 / 0) +8 2
7 @a9+1kjfx8m00 February 27 Anonymous top level 19 (+19 / 0) +19 2
8 @aa+1kjfx8m00 February 27 Anonymous top level 10 (+9 / -1) +8 2
9 @ae+1kjfx8m00 February 27 Anonymous top level 15 (+15 / 0) +15 1
10 @ap+1kjfx8m00 February 27 Anonymous top level 24 (+18 / -6) +12 1
11 @aq+1kjfx8m00 February 27 Anonymous ap 19 (+18 / -1) +17 1
12 @ar+1kjfx8m00 February 27 Anonymous ap 14 (+13 / -1) +12 1
13 @b3+1kjfx8m00 February 27 Anonymous top level 7 (+7 / 0) +7 1
14 @b4+1kjfx8m00 February 27 Anonymous b3 14 (+14 / 0) +14 1
15 @b5+1kjfx8m00 February 27 Anonymous b4 4 (+4 / 0) +4 1
16 @b9+1kjfx8m00 February 27 Anonymous top level 40 (+9 / -31) -22 1
17 @bb+1kjfx8m00 February 27 Anonymous b9 28 (+27 / -1) +26 1
18 @bx+1kjfx8m00 February 27 Anonymous top level 30 (+2 / -28) -26 1
19 @by+1kjfx8m00 February 27 Anonymous bx 19 (+18 / -1) +17 1
20 @bz+1kjfx8m00 February 27 Anonymous bx 23 (+12 / -11) +1 1
21 @c0+1kjfx8m00 February 27 Anonymous top level 38 (+6 / -32) -26 1
22 @c1+1kjfx8m00 February 27 Anonymous c0 24 (+22 / -2) +20 1
23 @c2+1kjfx8m00 February 27 G gecko top level 19 (+18 / -1) +17 1
24 @c8+1kjfx8m00 February 27 Anonymous c0 8 (+5 / -3) +2 1
25 @e9+1kjfx8m00 February 28 Anonymous top level 26 (+5 / -21) -16 1
26 @ec+1kjfx8m00 February 28 Anonymous OP 16 (0 / -16) -16 1
27 @ed+1kjfx8m00 February 28 Anonymous ec 21 (+21 / 0) +21 1
28 @ex+1kjfx8m00 February 28 Anonymous top level 7 (+1 / -6) -5 1
29 @ey+1kjfx8m00 February 28 Anonymous ap 10 (+10 / 0) +10 1
30 @ez+1kjfx8m00 February 28 Anonymous c0 11 (+8 / -3) +5 1
31 @f4+1kjfx8m00 February 28 Anonymous ez 13 (+2 / -11) -9 1
32 @f8+1kjfx8m00 February 28 Buffet table top level 14 (+14 / 0) +14 1
33 @fa+1kjfx8m00 February 28 Anonymous e9 33 (+32 / -1) +31 1
34 @fn+1kjfx8m00 February 28 Anonymous b4 21 (0 / -21) -21 1
35 @fq+1kjfx8m00 February 28 Anonymous fn 9 (+9 / 0) +9 1
36 @ft+1kjfx8m00 February 28 Anonymous fn 9 (+9 / 0) +9 1
37 @gn+1kjfx8m00 February 28 Anonymous fn 6 (+5 / -1) +4 1
38 @gp+1kjfx8m00 February 28 Anonymous c0 8 (+5 / -3) +2 1
39 @gq+1kjfx8m00 February 28 Anonymous e9 12 (+4 / -8) -4 1
40 @gz+1kjfx8m00 February 28 Anonymous top level 18 (+17 / -1) +16 1
41 @je+1kjfx8m00 March 1 Lotto top level 2 (+1 / -1) 0 1
42 @k6+1kjfx8m00 March 1 Anonymous top level 19 (+18 / -1) +17 1
43 @qb+1kjfx8m00 March 2 Anonymous top level 15 (+14 / -1) +13 1
44 @qf+1kjfx8m00 March 2 Anonymous top level 17 (+17 / 0) +17 1
45 @sf+1kjfx8m00 March 2 Nostradamus dame top level 5 (+5 / 0) +5 1
46 @sv+1kjfx8m00 March 2 Anonymous sf 8 (+8 / 0) +8 1
47 @14c+1kjfx8m00 March 5 Anonymous c0 3 (+3 / 0) +3 1
48 @153+1kjfx8m00 March 5 Anonymous sv 1 (+1 / 0) +1 1
Full reply text, oldest first
Reply 1 of 48, post ID @a2+1kjfx8m00
Date: February 27
Author: Pissedoff (self-chosen pseudonym)
In reply to: no post, opens a new line of discussion
Reactions: 14 total, +13 / -1, net +12
Address: https://www.thelayoff.com/p/@a2+1kjfx8m00
Dog sh-t. What an embarrassing place to work. Don’t worry as leadersh