Thread regarding Verizon Wireless layoffs

Do you think there are stores even indirects didn't want?

I'm at the slowest store in a district by a long ways. They transitioned a store that is a fair amount busier then us. We went from 7 reps down to 5 before the big layoff. Now we are losing another rep to a different store. I have not heard if they are replacing that position. But you can not run on 4 reps. Any chance they just flat out close us because we are slow enough even indirects didn't want us? Has anybody seen that play out?


by
| 11 views | | 4 replies (last 4 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kzxt7m1c

4 replies (most recent on top)

Indirect dealers want to take the stores that will turn a profit for them. The leaderboard is an absolute joke of a tool to micromanage store employees . They threaten us with divestitures if we don't get to the top of the leader board - then they sell off the most productive stores in the districts. Penalizes the high performers and rewards the slackers .

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5ps+1kzxt7m1c

@150 lease …. Stupid v2t

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @15n+1kzxt7m1c

Sometimes it is the least thing. Is the least too expensive to opt out of or is it so cheap that even the slow traffic is keeping it paid for

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @150+1kzxt7m1c

@OP indirects DO close locations or sell them to other operators.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dq+1kzxt7m1c

Post a reply

: