Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

Market Based No Loyalty Clown Show

The 8/1/25 email may end up being remembered as one of the most damaging leadership communications in AT&T’s history. Maybe even corporate world history. Not because of one quote, but because of the mindset behind it.

Employees said morale was declining, flexibility mattered, talent was leaving, and five-day RTO was making things worse. Instead of asking why so many people felt the same way, leadership explained why employees were wrong. Feedback was described as “more outliers than we’d like,” and employees were told there “might be a disconnect between you and your current professional choice.”

That response didn’t rebuild trust. It widened the gap between leadership and the workforce.

The issue was never just RTO. It was the message that came with it… when employee feedback conflicts with leadership’s narrative, the feedback not the strategy is what gets questioned.

You can mandate attendance. You can track presence. You can enforce compliance. But you can’t mandate trust, engagement, or belief in the direction of the company and that’s what Stinky is too boneheaded to understand.

Leadership is ultimately measured by results, whether people want to stay, whether top talent wants to join, and whether the company is moving in the right direction. Those are the questions that matter.

Stink is unfit to lead and should resign immediately.


by
| 1 view | | 12 replies (last 1 day ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kwc71b3v

12 replies (most recent on top)

The company has hit a brick wall. Too late with the fiber build. All the buy high sell low acquisitions. It’s over. Do the bare minimum and ride it as long as you can stomach the bs. Always look for another opportunity cuz that pink slip can happen at anytime now a days especially for non union employees. Or do like the person to my right that has been doing real estate while on the clock. Now that’s the bare minimum. Emails have consequences when they say “Your opinions don’t matter here. Now get in line.” No problem I can join the rest of the pi-s€d off masses. Check please.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d4+1kwc71b3v

The haters in this thread saying “nothing has changed” can say what they want, but they’re Stankey “team players” and likely hold T stock given how sycophantic they are…and look at the stock.

So who is really winning & right?

I don’t care about the company, don’t believe in Stankey, and am collecting my paycheck, selling my stock every bi weekly period and putting it into actual well managed companies.

You’re a brokie watching your retirement and savings dwindle away day by day, likely down tens or hundreds of thousands, if not more.

So keep saying “see you on the commute” cause I’ll be seeing you in the breadline when I drive by it in my Mercedes.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @am+1kwc71b3v

AT&T = The New Radio Shack. There are remnants in the company still of value that will be sold off. There are case studies being written on mismanagement. The new Plano location will never be occupied by AT&T.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ae+1kwc71b3v

@a6 Actually, things have changed. Most of the employees no longer ca about the work they do. 8&Skate is not a prevalent attitude. That is not the change Stank wanted, but that is what he has created!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1kwc71b3v

@a7 He did admit to regretting not starting his culture change implementation sooner. Of course, that just solidifies his narcissistic personality because he cannot bring himself to admit he erred.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1kwc71b3v

agree with what you said but also his comment “we need younger people” and other comments that CEOs should know better than to state aloud. He’s incompetent — doesn’t know how to be a CEO and just writes and says what he wants like a rich spoiled brat — but worse — he’s negatively impacted so many lives.
Why won’t anyone get him gone????

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1kwc71b3v

@2 I agree with the majority of your statements. The only point that I take issue with is that Stank felt “regret”. That did not even enter into his mind. Full scale narcissists (which Stank is) are born without the inter prospective chip. Regret is something that he clearly did not feel and never will.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1kwc71b3v

@a5 "It has been almost a year and nothing has changed, so was it really damaging?"

Interesting comment -- the entire message from Stank was that he has to CHANGE the culture, and as you just admitted, nothing has changed. So, not only has it been a complete failure of change, Stank has completely "lost the locker room" now. Yes, it really was damaging.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1kwc71b3v

It has been almost a year and nothing has changed, so was it really damaging?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1kwc71b3v

Considering where the email originated and who the intended audience was, it is, without doubt, the most damaging email in AT&T history. It might be the most damaging, intentional communication in corporate history. You could argue that there were other, more damaging communications, but those were normally errors and not meant to be sent

Whatever positive culture was left at AT&T was ki-led, like a dagger through the heart, when that email was released.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1kwc71b3v

John drank half a bottle of bourbon and wrote that out thinking it was pure genius. After sending it out, the next morning he was met with 75 missed calls from legal, a hangover, and regret.

That notorious drunken 8/1/25 email has done more damage to this company and his legacy than he could have ever imagined. Nothing will ever be the same again.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1kwc71b3v

And yet.

You know the rest.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1kwc71b3v

Post a reply

: