Thread regarding U.S. Bank layoffs

Ever shifting goalposts

Anyone notice that the new standard is “over” 60% of days in office vs hybrid 3 days a week = 60% exactly?
You will get 60.1% from me and nothing more. Also, thanks for the raise that doesn’t even cover commuting expense Gunjan!


by
| 141 views | | 45 replies (last April 9) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1knpzcagv

45 replies (most recent on top)

@a5 everything prior to May should be a mulligan. The fact that it's retroactive is very suspect, and will absolutely be used against us.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1knpzcagv

@a3 Seriously, rest of April should just be a mulligan if they're gonna change every thing up on us like this

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1knpzcagv

None of the middle line managers were prepared nor given a heads up, not that I trust them anyway, but that fully demonstrates the callus motives in an election to track people's shortcomings against the non required goal or expectations or employment requirement and should be expected to appear in any and all employment litigation resulting from the shifting sands approach to knock down employees, their compensation and their career at U. S Bank.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1knpzcagv

@a2 and the fact that they changed it and none of the people managers were prepared.

It's so blatantly obvious that this is setting people up to fail, especially with the retroactive tracking into last year. This company absolutely detests its employees and wants everyone to quit so they can offshore our jobs for 1/4 of the price.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1knpzcagv

It's the fact that we're all being set up to fail instead of succeed. If they wanted us to be successful with RTO then we would have transparency. With anything really, not just RTO.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1knpzcagv

Post a reply

: