Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

2019

Facts I find interesting.
We didnt have a CEO between March 28th and Oct 21st that yr.
Yet Net Income
Q1 $5.86B
Q2 $6.21B
Q3 $4.61B incl a 1.6B litigation so really $6.2B

We didnt even have a CEO. Q1 Tim Sloan even handed everyone in the company 30 shares, gave extra %sfor 401k matching over the yrs. Today Charlie has laid off 80k people, offices state side look like india... and he has worse financial numbers. Look at the pathetic number of shares he gave folks, you have to be here till mid 2028 as well. The problem with Chalie is he thinks Win/Lose, not Win/Win, and that's no way to operate a business, cheating employees to make numbers is the route to failure.


by
| 1081 views | | 5 replies (last February 18) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1khq7saqp

5 replies (most recent on top)

@bt You're splitting hairs. Parker was basically a substitute teacher. He was minding the store but not leading.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dc+1khq7saqp

Umm. Some of us where here. We remember our CEO was Allen Parker and he stepped down when Charlie was hired.

Sell your fantasy theories somewhere else.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bt+1khq7saqp

@OP it’s easy to calculate the value added under Schart: he reduced number of shares by 22% costing $49b since 2019.

The market cap as of today is approximately $270B vs November 2019’$200B or increase of $70B. During this time total net income was $104b. Dividends $35b.

Starting 3Q 2019 market CAP $200b
Total net income $104b
Dividends $35b
Buyback $49b

Book Net worth as of 3Q 2019 $197b vs $184b as of 12/31/25. (Actually decreased)

Today’s share is $86 vs $55 in 3Q 2019.

55/0.78=70.513 times 1.05% annual return for six years =$94. Buyback % boosted share price at a market 5% rate of return.

Did Schart increase the shareholder value?

Is Schart a leader a CEO that knows how to grow the business? Fix the problems? So that his $40M pay is justified?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1khq7saqp

C. Allen Parker, chief counsel, acted as interim CEO.

Where do you people come from.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1khq7saqp

@OP sadly the writing was on the wall when we were relegated to employees because being team members was cultish. He gets a 28% increase for missing financials and cutting the fat. Sadly WF was chunky. But it’s gone too far. Cutting your knowledge base and off shoring. But he will be long gone before the regulators are we-ponized again. Those left, handling the work of 3, will be left to pick up the pieces. At what cost? Work life balance? Back to the 80s we go. 70 hour work weeks. It’s really a travesty. But as someone very intelligently pointed out as long as customers don’t feel it, it won’t matter.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1khq7saqp

Post a reply

: