Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

10% credit card cap = more layoffs?

Will Charlie cater to Trump's wishes and make up for card LOB losses with increased layoffs if this cap went in? Maybe he's angling for the Fed chair job when all the juice has been squeezed out of this gig and be nice way to stand out.


by
| 1433 views | | 11 replies (last January 14) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kesa2qwt

11 replies (most recent on top)

In todays earnings call he blamed the miss on increased severance costs. WFC stock is down more than others that reported today.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mk+1kesa2qwt

Notice that @a9 was removed for providing accurate information but @aa was not despite being blatantly political.

This board has an agenda.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eq+1kesa2qwt

What su-ks is that if this holds, rewards and point programs will probably go into the toilet.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e6+1kesa2qwt

is this coming before or after the DOGE checks and the tariff checks?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ba+1kesa2qwt

orange man bullying private enterprise to help alleviate pain being felt by the public due to his mo--nic policies. wake up people!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b5+1kesa2qwt

Which banks are most exposed to such a cap? CapitalOne I assume is high on the list…

Exposure would be measured in something like % of interest income from consumer revolving credit.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @az+1kesa2qwt

I guess Charlie wasn't so smart dropping mortgages and being a mainstreet bank.. if only some of us knew

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ah+1kesa2qwt

@aa keep voting yourself up and proving @a9 correct.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1kesa2qwt

@a2 Left-wing troll. This is not a political commentary board. Conflaltion beyond reasonableness.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1kesa2qwt

never going to happen, and even if it did you can say goodbye to non prime or above lending and accounts closing down. if he wasn't worried about the midterms he wouldn't have brought this up. amd notice how it is only a one year reprieve, how convenient

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1kesa2qwt

First point, I think this is a retaliation pressure because Jamie Dimon has publicly stated he’s.not contributing to the golden ballroom because he’s afraid of future administration’s DOJ - basically calling it out as quid pro quo
But if it does happen, it will affect gross profits and jobs will feel the pain to accommodate his expense ratio

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1kesa2qwt

Post a reply

: