Given average is 4%, what are your thoughts? G, VG, E, O average?
Only serious discussions. No BTC/KLTC/outsourcing/pip discussion, please.
9 replies (most recent on top)
The reality is, it depends where you are in the curves and HR has latitude to encourage/discourage in addition to where you landed in the rankings. Two years ago I was NI, but received twice inflation. True story. It's a long game up to your final CL level with volatility year on year.
I will get the same as last year zero. I am a few years from retirement and nre. There is no reason exxon will give me anything. Exxon us doing this purposely as they are trying to drive us out. I am done with exxon and leaving asap.
It depends on more than just rankings. While that's a good starting point if you're up against the max on your salary band and you are NRE or close to it then you can be O and receive nothing unfortunately. If you're early in your career you have a higher chance of raises
@b4 Just remember, what goes around comes around.
@at it’s a hunger game. You chose to participate and nobody needs to show sympathy. Speaking of sympathy, I better show it to kids in war zone.
It depends on your job family. Upstream always gets more than downstream.
It’s difficult for colleagues and coworkers around the world, who are facing potential termination, to have much sympathy for your salary treatment concerns.
Avg is most definitely not 4%. 4% is the budget (4% of SWB for a function can be spread out to that function). So of that 4%, NI gets 0%, G gets less than inflation, and then up from there. O typically gets most but depends on % against salary band. I know lots of O who got basically 1% or less last year because they are up against band and need a promo to get more.
Same as it’s always been. G gets 1/4 of inflation, VG gets half, E gets inflation, and whatever is left goes to O.
There’s no way to win this game when they are actively working towards a headcount reduction target.