Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

"Collaboration" is just an excuse

The C suite just came up with that whole "collaboration" nonsense because they thought it would sound better than taking us all that the real reason for RTO is related to taxes around WF real estate.

These buildings need to be occupied more than half the time to fulfill some tax break, so we're all pointlessly forced into the office under a series of lies for why.

RTO consistently makes me want to do the absolute BARE minimum everyday. My trove of excuses continues to grow.

RTO is just a big game of chicken that WF has zero chance of winning in the long run.

@zvz+1janwhCf said it perfectly.

by
| 1458 views | | 8 replies (last October 17, 2022) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jbTaPVi

8 replies (most recent on top)

I would be quite happy watching the "great American city" die as a concept and people move to smaller communities. Cities bring out the worst in people and historically have been the birthplace of the worst social philosophies and governing malfeasances.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4obn+1jbTaPVi

Besides building occupancy, another reason is without a bunch of customers, small businesses around downtown can't survive and consequently they can't service the notes held by Wells Fargo. All this needs to change, because employees aren't going back, regardless of any combination of sticks and carrots.

I see a paradigm shift coming, very similar to when we shed the suits and went to casual clothing in late '90s.

Finally, this issue is across all employers, not just Wells Fargo.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1uht+1jbTaPVi

@ kcx+1jbTaPVi
Wells Fargo served as one of the arrangers for a $1.5 billion senior construction loan at HY.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ybz+1jbTaPVi

Why else do you think they are selling the Park Avenue office and moving those that were assigned there to Hudson Yards?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kcx+1jbTaPVi

But the tax break isn't permanent. There's always an end date to these sweetheart property tax deals.

It's seems hard to believe that all hubs are currently under such a deal.

Forced RTO should only apply to hubs with a current agreement (until the agreement expires). It's not unfair, it's just what it is.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xyz+1jbTaPVi

"These buildings need to be occupied more than half the time to fulfill some tax break"

If true, this makes complete sense.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pps+1jbTaPVi

Just like “fosters communication” was a BS reason for cramming people into open offices.

It was about saving money on office space and they could not have cared less that it made it ten times harder to do our jobs. Not their problem.

They had private offices of course.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dqm+1jbTaPVi

Yes! Another rant about collaboration. I am glad you posted OP, we have barely beaten this topic into the ground on this site yet.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tfe+1jbTaPVi

Post a reply

: