Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Developers are the New Bankers

‘Developers Are the New Bankers’: Wells Fargo Analysts Predict Wave of Job Cuts
By Jennifer Surane
September 28, 2021, 4:00 AM CDT
Banks may eliminate 100,000 jobs over 5 years, analysts say
Compensation costs may not decline as quickly as headcount

The era of bankers dominating banking is over as software developers rise -- and a record wave of job cuts will soon sweep the industry.

That’s according to Wells Fargo & Co. analysts led by Mike Mayo, who estimated that the technology improvements and automation these developers bring will allow the industry to cut 100,000 jobs over the next five years.

“New job additions could lower reduction levels, but our conclusion is still that this will be the biggest reduction in U.S. bank headcount in history,” Mayo, along with six other senior equity analysts, said in a note to clients late Monday.

Banks spend more on technology than any other industry and had to set aside a whopping $200 billion for information technology last year alone. That’s meant the technologists they hire play an increasingly important role inside the world’s largest financial institutions, the Wells Fargo analysts found.

Many of the job cuts will hit lower-paid roles. The financial-services industry -- which operates some of the world’s largest call centers -- will likely “aggressively” reduce headcount in such locations, the analysts said. Branch workforces may drop 20% over the next several years, and could account for as much as one-third of banks’ total reduction.

Software developers wield greater influence over lenders’ purchasing decisions and budgets for their tools are ever increasing, the analysts found. That means banks are looking to add technologists and front-line employees to help manage their apps and websites as consumers rapidly adapted to new finance tools during the pandemic.

“Developers are the new bankers,” Mayo and the analysts said in the 110-page report. “These tend to be higher-paying positions, so it may be the case that while banks reduce headcount, they don’t lower compensation as quickly.”

Lenders have had trouble improving back-office functions, the analysts found. That’s partly because banks are deliberately cautious when upgrading those systems and they face extra regulatory oversight when doing so.

“Progress in the back office remains a slog,” Mayo and the analysts said in the report, noting such employees currently account for about half of all bank employees. “Some will succumb to technology, but others may require changes in regulation or laws to be fully eliminated. In any event, banks should be able to significantly cut back-office headcount over time.”

Banks have spent years promising that the extra spending on technology would ultimately help drive down costs. While it might be bad for job prospects, it’s finally poised to help profitability, the Wells Fargo analysts found.

If interest rates normalize over the next five years, it would shave more than 9 percentage points from the industry’s efficiency ratio -- a measure of profitability that represents how much it costs to produce a dollar of revenue, Wells Fargo found.

“We believe tech requires banks to better compete, enables the biggest structural change in history, and puts record efficiency within reach,” the analysts said.

Someone should bring Charlie up to date. He prefers to spend money on company stock buybacks, rather than technology.*

by
| 2407 views | | 5 replies (last September 29, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1d3z2GuB

5 replies (most recent on top)

Part of our job here is tracking inbound and outboud work at the loading docks. Filling out lots and lots and lots of forms.

A while back they changed everyones title here to Software Engineer. Don't make sense to me. Sanitation Engineer would be closer! LOL

I heard the same thing where they said we're all bankers now. I don't get it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yrd+1d3z2GuB
1.8 Million people employed in the US commercial banking industry and losing 100,000 is supposed to be a major disruption?

Nice sensationalist article.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oew+1d3z2GuB

Nor do the fintechs offer insured deposits, thus no regulation. One day that might matter however.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wgo+1d3z2GuB

Considering most developers don’t understand the banking business nor seem to care a lot of times, that’s not exactly a good thing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @div+1d3z2GuB

They're not really wrong. Fintechs are doing all sorts of things that big banks might not want to, or can't do. The large banks have way more scrutiny on them than the fintechs who are smaller, more nimble, and could do certain things big banks can't easily do.

How many people really need to go into a branch these days? Nowhere near as many as before. Many of these fintechs have no branches either.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mhg+1d3z2GuB

Post a reply

: