Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Wells Fargo loses (another) broker over policy change on international clients

A financial advisor seeking a new broker-dealer after her prior firm dropped its international business joined a company whose specialty is serving practices that have foreign clients.

Paula Oddone left Wells Fargo Advisors after 18 years to join the Snowden Lane Partners branch in Coral Gables, Florida, her new firm said on Sept. 7. As a sole practitioner, Oddone manages more than $135 million in client assets across a base spanning South America and Central America, as well as the Caribbean.

Just like some other teams leaving Wells Fargo this year, Oddone cited the giant wealth manager’s decision in January to cease working with international clients as the main reason for her move. Corporate policy changes that are out of advisors’ control often lead them to change firms in search of greater flexibility.

Policy change is old news, but whoever made the boneheaded decision to stop working with international clients should be publicly shamed and fired. WFA has lost some of it’s highest producing teams over this decision. How is it that one of the top 4 banks in the country can’t handle working with any client outside of the US? Are we going to stop all profitable business which requires a competent Compliance Department since we apparently can’t even handle the basics???

by
| 1575 views | | 6 replies (last September 9, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1cJU7M5p

6 replies (most recent on top)

You guys are short-sighted. WFA is extremely profitable relative to other WF businesses. For high producing advisors to leave is so counterproductive and a detriment to shareholder value. WFA is so profitable that Corporate reaches into that cookie jar for other silly projects or to put a bandaid on other non-productive areas

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1djy+1cJU7M5p

we lose advisors (and gain new ones) ALL THE TIME. this is certainly not news. FA's and especially the high-producing ones are the biggest risks to the firm as they're constantly skirting the rules and pushing back on compliance efforts "because you know how much I make the firm" and it's a nightmare. most of them should be gone anyway. I used to work in supervision and if our regulators even knew half of the stuff they were allowed to get away with we wouldn't have a broker dealer anymore.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1uim+1cJU7M5p

Advisors had to be dumped. Too much baggage.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bjf+1cJU7M5p

What a ginormous handout this was to Morgan Stanley and UBS. There were about 300 advisors affected with average production north of 800k/yr.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tek+1cJU7M5p

On the one hand, Wells Fargo has to pay out millions of dollars in upfront packages to persuade Financial Advisors to come work here. And on the other hand, we are making business decisions which are forcing FAs to leave. Another blunder which makes us the laughing stock of banks.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fwz+1cJU7M5p

Two words: asset cap. When business costs you in terms of oversight and complex rules better to go for the more simplistic business to manage. Costs less, more volume to fit under the cap.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uga+1cJU7M5p

Post a reply

: