Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

OCC unhappy with progress and threatens more sanctions

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/regulators-warn-wells-fargo-possible-201943102.html

NEW YORK, Aug 31 (Reuters) - Frustrated at the pace of Wells Fargo & Co's efforts to compensate victims of its sales practice scandals, U.S. regulators have warned they may impose new sanctions on the bank, Bloomberg reported on Tuesday.

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) have signaled to the bank they are not satisfied with its progress, including the bank's attempts to improve its governance and risk controls, the report said.

Wells Fargo's stock fell 5.6% on the news.

Representatives from the OCC and the CFPB did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Wells Fargo declined to comment.

The bank, the fourth-largest in the United States, has been dogged by persistent costs and restrictions tied to its years-old sales practice scandals. Employees opened some 3.5 million phony accounts in customers’ names without their permission to artificially hit internal sales targets.

In 2016, Wells reached a $190 million settlement with the CFPB, the OCC and a Los Angeles prosecutor over the practice.

In 2018, the Federal Reserve ordered that Wells Fargo keep its assets below $1.95 trillion until it had improved governance and risk controls, and it entered into a sweeping consent order with the OCC related to selling of mortgage and auto-insurance products.

The bank has sought more time to resolve the issues raised by the consent orders, according to Bloomberg.

The asset cap has constrained the bank's ability to make loans or grow, its executives said in July. Further sanctions could hurt the bank's growth prospects.

It was not clear when regulators might proceed, Bloomberg reported. (Reporting by Elizabeth Dilts Marshall in New York; Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

by
| 2879 views | | 11 replies (last September 7, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1cGquLVB

11 replies (most recent on top)

Let's not lie to ourselves.

We deserve another round of sanctions.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2hpu+1cGquLVB

RCSA is completely useless and will not meet any of the MRAs

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2oyv+1cGquLVB

No surprised. They are currently stripping away progress from previous MRAs to satisfy the new ones instead of adding to what has already been satisfied to keep the company satisfying all of this. The regulators probably think the place is full of mo--ns. They have never asked if some of them needed time extended to which they were told no. It’s already obvious to the regulators and the OC that the company is brain dead and unraveling all the progress it’s already made.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2wvr+1cGquLVB

wait when is the next layoff? ill wait to change jobs

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yrc+1cGquLVB

That's beautiful man

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1tlb+1cGquLVB

@xov+
I'm right there with you on Nasdaq. 33% in ETH and Doggie coins. 33% in Solar. and a basket of tech that never made a profit in the prior decade - 33%.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cub+1cGquLVB

1) Get billions in fines, consent orders, etc from poor risk management and consumer abuse for years.

2) Get new CEO to turn it around.

3) Lay off tons of people to cut expenses and heads, appease investors.

4) Get more feedback from OCC, CFPB that you aren't making enough progress on 1) above.

5) Rinse and repeat.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @art+1cGquLVB

@vgy keep holding your breath for that 48% retracement to the last high.

I'll go with the NASDAQ, personally.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xov+1cGquLVB

While this is old news at the point.. I would say use logic and follow the trail. Yahoo points to article by Reuters who points to an article at some alt Bloomberg new outlet. This alt Bloomberg outlet article points to “people close”, there’s no specific people mentioned.
Then follow the money trail… who has the most to gain financially in saying things aren’t getting done FAST. Most likely its a partner at Deloitte, KPMG, McKinsey. They have their fat contracts cut back from 100 to 50 million or something and they get angry and start acting as a unnamed source that leaks bogus information. Or it could even be a hedge fund that see’s WF as a buying opportunity and want to load up cheap by leaking false rumors. When billions are on the line don’t think market manipulation wouldn’t occur, its the rule not the exception.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vgy+1cGquLVB

I'm so glad more layoffs please.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pmc+1cGquLVB

Been under a rock OP? There's at least 2 threads on this already.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @crp+1cGquLVB

Post a reply

: