This should be interesting. Are they hoping to show how unhappy we are working from home so they can tell us how much better off we are next year?
12 replies (most recent on top)
Trying to block out the noise from leadership, do my work and move on from this place after I have bit more tenure. This whole top down approach is not for me - such a miserable company to work for.
It’s always controlled questions that give them the response they want. They need to have open comments, but they will never do that. Too much work.
We can't even believe that they will address or investigate ethics violations as they've stated. Those that are "in control" are those that are being ratted on. Nothing will come of it.
The entire executive team is rotten.
I don’t experience the culture that others describe on this site, so yeah i’m happy with the culture.
Do you have a friend at work? The results will be completely fabricated. 80% of team members are super happy with the culture! All bulls**t.
Average pay rate per hour is prob around 20
20 per hour x .5 hours x 255000 employees = $2,550,000 to take a survey that serves only as a powerpoint page in deck.
Why are we paying this guy?
A far more valuable use of his time would be metrics showing how the attrition plan is affecting morale, rates of release and what types and levels of employees are leaving to truly gauge the impact to operational readiness and sime prefictives on how it will affect the shareholder would be nice.
Lets deal with the real.
They did listen under Sloan’s lead. I highly doubt Scharf will.
It's a check the box move to show the board and other execs that they are "listening". Nothing meaningful will happen out of it, other than it becomes a fancy bullet point on a presentation.
The questions won’t be meaningful. Chuckles did the same thing at BNY Mellon and the questions were completely pointless. You’ll see. This guy truly is a one trick pony.
Absolute opportunity to voice our concerns.. that is if the questions are posed in a way that lends to a constructive dialogue and doesn’t feed into top of the house’s manufactured narrative of corporate KoolAid kumbaya. Hopefully there’s a section with a decent character count allotment for a real discussion as opposed to ranking how we feel about a wide branching attribute. If they are serious about real answers, the need to ask them regardless the outcome. Otherwise the entire exercise is window dressing.🤷🏻
I'll take the survey, it'll be interesting to see if the questions are written as if they might be useful or if it's a "heads we win, tails we also win" situation designed to prove 'evidence' to support their narrative.
Waste of time. They have never once acted on feedback from these.