Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Dimon got a big reward to stay for another 5 years

Buckle up whiners.. Charlie is next

by
| 1353 views | | 14 replies (last July 22, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1bWpy8UQ

14 replies (most recent on top)

Dimon...lol...lol...lol...Chainsaw...lol..lol..lol.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rwv+1bWpy8UQ

@lxl+1bWpy8UQ You said it perfectly bubba

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vzj+1bWpy8UQ

Simon has a torn heart with a yr to live and 1.8billion.. unless you get to take it to heaven

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tof+1bWpy8UQ

Let’s face it. Dimon is Dimon. Charlie is Charlie and whiners are whiners. LOL

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nxo+1bWpy8UQ

Say what you want, but Dimon is looked to for directionality of the economy more than perhaps even the fed chair.

Smart dude. I wish jis protege was too

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lho+1bWpy8UQ

It's a good week for the Dimon and extended fam! He got stock options worth gazillions and his son in law got a new exec gig at WF!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nts+1bWpy8UQ

Does Charlie ever come down to the fryer station and pat you on the helmet for posting this stuff OP?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xcx+1bWpy8UQ

Why not? Stumpf got reward handsomely right?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kjp+1bWpy8UQ

In February, the asset cap will celebrate its fourth birthday.

That’s also when CS will celebrate serving as CEO for the same amount of time as Sloan.

So employees lives got much worse, but very little else has changed and certainly not the asset cap. Mostly he gave jobs to his friends, created unneeded executive roles, promoted his mentor’s son in law and closed museums.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kzp+1bWpy8UQ

@lxl+1bWpy8UQ. Charlie is doing fine. As an employee and also a shareholder I am ok with him.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @srt+1bWpy8UQ

Charlie is no Jamie Dimon. Having said that, I wouldn’t want to work for Dimon either lol.
But at least Dimon is an original - he’s not a “wannabe”. I have no respect for copycats.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rmg+1bWpy8UQ

@lxl+1bWpy8UQ. They do because they can. Was it up to you how Charlie got hire nor care about what you think? No one needs to explain to you either. Get a grip!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fpf+1bWpy8UQ

Why would they reward Charlie for poor performance? Please tell me what he's done to make this company better, because I'm not seeing it.

He is even failing at his primary objective which is to lay people off and reduce his beloved efficiency ratio! How hard can that really be? Give people their notice, pay them off if needed, and send them on their way. He clearly couldn't care less about employee morale or the performance of the company, so he should just pull the bandaid off already. But no, he's taking the lazy role of trying to force us out by making us miserable, which still isn't working. He's a pathetic excuse for a so-called "leader" and a human.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lxl+1bWpy8UQ

I think the new idea over there is more current --> Remote First Workforce

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nuc+1bWpy8UQ

Post a reply

: