Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Microsoft's Creepy New 'Productivity Score' Gamifies Workplace Surveillance

Microsoft rolled out its new “Productivity Score” feature this month, which lets bosses track how their employees use Microsoft's suite of tools. If that sounds like...

https://gizmodo.com/microsofts-creepy-new-productivity-score-gamifies-workp-1845763063


Microsoft's Creepy New 'Productivity Score' Gamifies Workplace Surveillance
Microsoft rolled out its new “Productivity Score” feature this month, which lets bosses track how their employees use Microsoft’s suite of tools. If that sounds like an Orwellian nightmare in the making to you, you’re not alone—privacy experts are criticizing the company for essentially gamifying workplace surveillance.
When Microsoft first announced the feature in October, the company billed it as a way to provide “insights that transform how work gets done” to employers. To do this, the tool gathers data on each employee’s behavior across 73 metrics and presents a handy-dandy breakdown to their bosses at the end of each month, Forbes reports.
These metrics include how often workers turn their cameras on during virtual meetings, how frequently they send emails (and how many contain @ mentions), whether they regularly contribute to shared documents or group chats, and the number of days they used Microsoft’s tools such as Word, Excel, Skype, Outlook, or Teams in the last month, just to name a few. Microsoft lays out all the ways it monitors you through its office suite in the company’s own documentation, though admittedly you’ll have to go digging through about a dozen web pages to find them.
Microsoft 365's corporate VP Jared Spataro specified in a blog post that the feature, which debuted to little fanfare on Nov. 17, is “not a work monitoring tool” and that Microsoft has incorporated several security measures to demonstrate its commitment to privacy. For example, every employee’s productivity score is aggregated over a 28-day period, and there are privacy controls available to anonymize that data or remove it completely.
Of course, what Spataro conveniently fails to mention is that only an administrator, aka your boss, can access those controls in the first place, which is zero comfort for any employee justifiably concerned about potential invasions of privacy. In a statement to Guardian, a Microsoft spokesperson echoed this pretense of choice, calling the feature “an opt-in experience” even though workers aren’t the ones who can decide whether to opt-in.
Privacy experts are understandably p-ss-d to see blatant workplace surveillance repackaged as a productivity optimization tool, and one with a cutesy game-themed “score” design no less. David Heinemeier Hansson, co-founder of the office suite Basecamp, described the feature’s design as “morally bankrupt at its core” in a series of tweets this week.
Data privacy researcher Wolfie Christl, who called the feature “problematic at many levels,” pointed out that while Microsoft offers employers the option to turn off employee monitoring, it’s enabled by default when they first boot up Microsoft 365. He added that Microsoft’s new tool may even be illegal in some European Union countries given the region’s strict regulations on how companies can access user data.
“One way to crystalize just how creepy this scheme is is by imagining a person with a stopwatch and a clipboard sitting behind you. Meticulously recording how long you spend on each task, compiling a dossier on everyone doing the same, then reporting the findings to management,” he said.
Workplace surveillance has become a particularly prevalent concern this year with the pandemic pushing more and more people to work from home. In June, the research firm Gartner found that 16% of employers were using monitoring tools more frequently to track their workers’ computer usage, internal communications, and engagement among other data. And with coronavirus cases continuing to climb to record heights in the U.S., experts expect the development and adoption of these tools to only ramp up further.
Gizmodo weekend editor. Freelance games reporter. Full-time disaster bi.
Goddamn, the Simpsons predicted the solution to Micro$oft’s b—s— productivity monitoring.
by
| 3243 views | | 7 replies (last November 28, 2020) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+188lATeS

7 replies (most recent on top)

If you have mastered the email adding “it’s Great team work” line and toward spraying it to everyone you can. You are on your way to becoming a I-16 level government employee. Keep up the good work. If at the end of the day you are tired and bored because you didn’t actual do anything meaningful in life again, get a hobby. Playing a musical instrument or art will help with that stress. Don’t forget you can create and play buzzword bingo during those all important zoom meetings.
You can have fun, while appearing to take notes and that is another feather in your cap.
Don’t forget you can share your bingo card with your friends at work, and help them become more productive too.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ajn+188lATeS

It's ALL a numbers game folks... it's just a "measurement" system made up by humans... and exploited by the bad ones... numbers didn't create the Universe...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dth+188lATeS

So the people who actually spend time thinking will be let go and the people who work at gaming the system will be praised and petted. Sounds about right.

Turn on camera - check.
Make lots of comments in group chats along the lines of Great Idea! and I Agree! - check.
Send emails encapsulating every move I make and conversation I have - check.

Hey, I'm looking good! Haven't actually done anything yet, but hey - so what! Like one of my managers once told me - it's not the result, it's the process.

Go Wells Fargo!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vtp+188lATeS

Wells is using this?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zwp+188lATeS

Wells already tracks us and reads our communications. Pretty much every major corporation does, and lots of smaller ones, too.

The problem with rating people based on these kinds of metrics is they don't include time fixing things, and around here everything is broken, so that takes up a lot of time.

For example, I can have Task A on my list, and Task A includes a bunch of steps to complete, and half those steps involve other people, some of whom are on PTO, some don't know how to use the new systems, and some are on teams that are overworked with everything running behind.

How do you judge me based on that?

On an assembly line sure, as long as you have reasonable expectations of how fast humans can work, but for IT or project management or marketing or a whole bunch of financial work, counting seconds between keyboard clicks is fundamentally stupid.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pef+188lATeS

You think this hasn’t already been happening here and everywhere? You really think Microsoft is the “first”??

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vkn+188lATeS

Double-edged sword. Somebody who doesn't even know what an "@ mention" is isn't going to send many of them. Is more "@ mentions" better? Or does it indicate something else? No conclusion can be drawn there.

Another example is "contributing" to group chats. Some of the worse performing people I work with are also some of the most vocal on IM and chats; whereas some of the best people are very quiet and don't say a word. Again, no meaningful conclusion can be drawn there.

I'm in Tech. Every one of us has 2 computers. One of limited capacity which is on the WF network, and the other which is not on the WF network. No way they can monitor the one that's NOT on the WF network - and if that's the one where a lot of the real work gets done......

But sadly we can see what's coming. Management will blindly accept whatever metrics the system gives them without understanding what those metrics actually mean, and they'll use it to reward non-performers while at the same time alienating those who actually do meaningful work.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kbz+188lATeS

Post a reply

: