Great question! The advice on this thread is good, to stay quiet for a multitude of good reasons.
It certainly does reflect how the past and current management decisions have put us in to the “every man for himself” mode, rather than bringing us together to save a company that feels like our company rather than their company. A better management team would have done this all differently and achieved an ultimate better healthier outcome. It’s just not that difficult to lead a company in the right direction if you have a moral compass and focus on leading by example showing honesty, gratitude, humility, empathy and respect.
Charlie Scharf could have gained a high degree of loyalty and trust from his employees if he would have kicked this off with Voluntary layoffs rather than Mandatory. You can put a clause in the package giving the company the right to decline certain employees who volunteer for the package. And I would add that if a valuable employee wants to leave, and you want them to stay: pay them more!
Secondly, how about a leader that doesn’t take the big pay package up front before he’s proven himself? I’m assuming Charlie Scharf already has enough money, right? I have trouble getting behind the guy who is taking a paycheck 500X greater than the average employee and then comes in and starts cutting jobs. How about you prove than you can lead this company to success first? I would feel guilty and wouldn’t be able to look myself in the mirror.