Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

No New US-Based Hiring & BLM

All tech jobs going to India/Offshore. No new US-based tech jobs.
I would think if Wells is embracing D&I with such fervor and sincerity that they might consider offering local people of color tech jobs and opportunities. How can you help the underprivileged in the local communities by sending their jobs and opportunities to India.

Unless is all bull sh– as usual.

by
| 2997 views | | 15 replies (last August 26, 2020) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+16C5vzcv

15 replies (most recent on top)

There is no way the entire tech staff is going overseas.

I agree BUT there is going to be a large-scale conversion to EGS.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1tmh+16C5vzcv

I feel dumb after reading this post and thread, thanks

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gbg+16C5vzcv

you just dated the both of us ;-)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ssx+16C5vzcv

"what's an id-t?"

The site does that when you use potential offensive words. Do you need an ID-10T form?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rqd+16C5vzcv

what's an id-t?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @epf+16C5vzcv

My god, you are an id–t. 10,000's thousands is at least 10,000,000 (10,000 X 1000). The layoff will be 10's of thousands. Multiples of 10 X 1000 is at least 10,000.

"We don't have "10,000's thousands" ... have you see the count of Charlie's total Team lately... it's over 275K"

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vcf+16C5vzcv

We don't have "10,000's thousands" ... have you see the count of Charlie's total Team lately... it's over 275K

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @igo+16C5vzcv

We don't even have "10,000's of thousands" to layoff. That's at least 10 million.

Maybe tens of thousands?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kyk+16C5vzcv

Fine... I wrote that. My mistake.
Correction: ALL NEW TECH JOBS GOING TO INDIA

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lco+16C5vzcv

Not gas lighting at all. The facts are:
1) They are laying of "10,000's of thousands"
2) They are looking to cut $10B
How are they going to do that?
Attrition, eliminating open positions, and layoffs.

Eliminating Open positions and offshoring them to India. That is a fact and a Saul directive.

Fact - they are pushing a D&I agenda.

I am suggesting that a great well to help a disadvantaged person is by giving them a job. WF wants it both ways... they want to help minorities and offshore jobs... Can't have both.

Not gas lighting.
Just reporting facts and asking a question.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cgd+16C5vzcv

Better read first sentence again. You clearly said All tech jobs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xxp+16C5vzcv

Sorry, this was about an announcement about hiring restrictions, or an inference based on a couple of open reqs on one tech team? If it was the latter, that's a pretty reckless claim. Gaslighting, really.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tpb+16C5vzcv

They're not mutually exclusive.

They're more focused on saving money by moving offshore. Thing is, does it take 3 off shore resources to do what 1 does onshore? Not to mention the hassle of time difference, language and cultural challenges (not a knock on diversity, but reality is sometimes differences in language, like heavy accent and culture cause challenges even between Indians that have been here a while and those that are still in India).

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pwt+16C5vzcv

I didn't say that. I said, no new US-Based hiring. Those that will survive the layoffs will stay... My team had several open tech jobs and they were all sent to India.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lva+16C5vzcv

There is no way the entire tech staff is going overseas.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @est+16C5vzcv

Post a reply

: