Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

Stock buybacks point AT&T in the wrong direction

Something disturbing is happening at AT&T, and it affects all Americans who rely on having access to reliable telecommunications services.

Under pressure from vulture hedge fund manager Paul Singer, the company recently committed to spending 70 percent of its free cash flow - a massive $30 billion - on buying back its own stock to boost share prices.

While this worrying trend is becoming more common across corporate America, AT&T's example is particularly troubling because of its proud tradition of connecting all Americans by providing universal service. AT&T employs more than 200,000 people in communities all across the country, creating and sustaining family-supporting jobs. Using profits to enrich wealthy shareholders and corporate executives through stock buybacks puts that tradition in jeopardy.

Although AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson promised to invest in the company's network and create at least 7,000 new jobs with the billions the company received from the Tax Cut and Jobs Act, AT&T has cut more than 30,000 jobs since the bill went into effect in January 2018.

At a hearing earlier this year that Sen. Baldwin hosted to highlight the effects of these harmful stock buybacks, we heard from Joe Olson, a CWA leader from Wisconsin, who has worked at AT&T for 20 years. The week he testified at the hearing, AT&T was closing a call center in Appleton, Wis., that once employed almost 400 people, devastating that small community.

As a member of the Business Roundtable, AT&T's CEO Stephenson recently signed a pledge to stop putting the interests of large shareholders above all else, describing a vision of "inclusive prosperity." AT&T's broken promises on jobs and its quick capitulation to Paul Singer's demand for increased stock buybacks show how hollow the promises of these corporations really are.

AT&T isn't the only company that used false promises to secure enormous tax breaks that went right into the pockets of its largest shareholders. As the New York Times recently reported, since the Tax Cut and Jobs Act passed, American companies have spent nearly three times as much on additional dividends and stock buybacks than on increased investment.

We can't rely on promises. To ensure that the profits that large corporations are making in our communities are reinvested in those communities, we need legislation to rein in corporate stock buybacks and empower workers to have a say in how their company's profits are spent.

That's what the Reward Work Act, which Sen. Baldwin introduced, and CWA members support, does. It bans open-market stock buybacks that overwhelmingly benefit executives and activist hedge funds at the expense of workers and retirement savers. In order to keep profits in communities and empower workers, the legislation also requires that one-third of the corporate board be elected by employees, which a National Bureau of Economic Research report recently found raises investment, increases workers' skills, reduces outsourcing, increases gender diversity in boardrooms, and lowers companies' debt payments.

Imagine if workers at AT&T had the power to re-direct spending from stock buybacks to productive investments. AT&T could build next generation fiber and broadband networks, not just in the big cities and wealthy suburbs, but also in underserved rural areas of our country. In these areas, reliable, high-speed communications infrastructure is necessary to deliver critical services for businesses, residents, and first responders and would jump-start new business development. This new power could end the looting of public companies and create shared economic prosperity in America.

It's time to stop listening to what AT&T says about its relationship with working people and time to start watching what it's actually doing to our communities. Behind their rhetoric, this company is playing with thousands of people's lives to maximize profits for wealthy shareholders, and every American should be paying attention.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/politics/476004-stock-buybacks-point-att-in-the-wrong-direction%3famp

by
| 2577 views | | 18 replies (last December 30, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+12JOZIQk

18 replies (most recent on top)

Check out FAKE: Fake Money, Fake Teacher, Fake Assets by Robert T Kiyosaki. You'll learn GRUNCH (Gross Universal Cash Heist, and about the Elitists, like Obama, The Clintons, the Bush's, Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, and Janet Yellen to name a few of the Elitists that are stealing all of our wealth for themselves, families and friends as in not us poor people. What you will realize when going through this book/e-book or audible, this is exactly what AT&T and the top leaders, aka The S's and the Johns have been doing and are in the middle of doing, robber baron our company that we built.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2kbj+12JOZIQk

@12JOZIQk-2ldk Great article in the end it doesn’t matter what you know if you happen to get in the way of randy and Stankey enriching themselves it is tough luck. What a couple of slime balls.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2cgj+12JOZIQk

If you interested in the how executives steal the money. Here ya go https://www.epsilontheory.com/yeah-its-still-water/

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ldk+12JOZIQk

Recent financial articles by epsilon theory and Ben Hunt has shown the accounting of how all buybacks are disguised transfer of money to executives and boards. For all Fortune 500 companies this is true. It’s illegal in other countries. For a reason.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2luq+12JOZIQk

Stock buyback is just a tax efficient way to pay money to the investors versus paying direct dividends. If you don't like capitalism, you're in the wrong country. There are plenty of others to choose from, but for some reason no one wants to move there. Or maybe they have an immigration system and don't want to let you in.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bvm+12JOZIQk

I thought it was well known that Obama started rocketing the national debt to clear up the 2008 recession. Quantitative Easing was simply printing more money to increase the value of the stock market and make people feel rich again. Trump did not changed this policy.

The benefit for us is that investments in the stock market paid far more than a savings account, and stable dividend stocks like ATT became the new savings accounts. This gave ATT enough capital to build Uverse, deploy real 4G, buy DirecTV, and buy Time Warner. If more capital was needed , ATT could sell stock and pay the recurring dividends. For the company, paying dividends is just like paying interest on a loan. If the dividends are more expensive than the interest would have been, it's better for the company to buy back stocks.
What does this have to do with Layoffs? Less capital investment = less enhancing work and fewer employees to finish the enhancing projects. If you are mostly paid out of sustaining dollars, you are less likely to be sold off to IBM, TechM, or Accenture.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bwy+12JOZIQk

Stop the lies. The Trump tax cut is helping all of us AT&T workers. Buybacks are also benefitting the AT&T workers. Working at AT&T has never been this good before Trump.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1klq+12JOZIQk

Randall & Company can tell Elliot fund to go pound sand. They own what? 1 % of the company stock. Seems like they are in cahoots and the vulture fund is just a foil to make it appear they are being forced into these decisions.

In addition to the vultures, whom is going to benefit the most? C-suite with a lot of stock options that is going to be sold in the near future when they pull the golden ripcord.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tei+12JOZIQk

Read the Creature of jeckyl Island for for more info on the origins of “ The Fed”

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @afi+12JOZIQk

The Federal Reserve is a private banking cabal Which recently celebrated its 100th year of enslaving the American public circ. 1913-2013. They only represent the interests of their own cartel and are about as Federal as Federal Express

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eha+12JOZIQk

pump and dump is the name of the game.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uzy+12JOZIQk

Let's look at an objective source regarding " Who Owns the Federal Reserve?"

The Federal Reserve Banks are not a part of the federal government, but they exist because of an act of Congress. Their purpose is to serve the public. So is the Fed private or public?

The answer is both. While the Board of Governors is an independent government agency, the Federal Reserve Banks are set up like private corporations. Member banks hold stock in the Federal Reserve Banks and earn dividends. Holding this stock does not carry with it the control and financial interest given to holders of common stock in for-profit organizations. The stock may not be sold or pledged as collateral for loans. Member banks also appoint six of the nine members of each Bank's board of directors.

https://www.stlouisfed.org/in-plain-english/who-owns-the-federal-reserve-banks

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xgy+12JOZIQk

Let's see what the Federal Reserve says about themselves.
https://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/about_14986.htm
The Federal Reserve System is not "owned" by anyone. The Federal Reserve was created in 1913 by the Federal Reserve Act to serve as the nation's central bank. The Board of Governors in Washington, D.C., is an agency of the federal government and reports to and is directly accountable to the Congress. ...The Board—appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate—provides general guidance for the Federal Reserve System and oversees the 12 Reserve Banks. ...Some observers mistakenly consider the Federal Reserve to be a private entity because the Reserve Banks are organized similarly to private corporations

I think these people who make this "mistake" watch a lot of RT and peruse Zerohedge.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @frl+12JOZIQk

It is all a scam. One big giant Ponzi scheme. The constant Federal Reserve and U.S. Treasury digitally printing of Monopoly money. What exactly backs a US Dollar? It is all just 0s and 1s. There will be a day of reckoning. Governments and corporations worldwide have accumulated trillions in debt. The cost of that debt is being artificially kept near zero by the manipulation of the various international governments involved. It is unsustainable and will crash. In my lifetime? Who knows? But mathematically it is impossible to continue. The law of gravity has yet to be repealed.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zbz+12JOZIQk

Fear not stock buy backs will continue in earnest as we enter unchartered waters with negative interest rates. Full faith and credit!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @plh+12JOZIQk

There is a couple of points I would make. Landline telephony is obsolete. We'll see Exhibit "A" 1st quarter 2020 with Frontier's likely bankruptcy. Universal service will be universal cellphone.

The other point I'd make is, AT&T has a lot of debt. They could either pay down this debt or buy back shares. The reason why it is economically feasible to buy back shares is entirely due to the Federal Reserve printing money in order to keep interest rates artificially low. If interest rates were higher, they would be paying down debt. Trump is running $85B/month in deficits, and the Federal Reserve is printing away about $60B/month. If Trump's deficits actually competed with other debt for financing, interest rates would soar, and there would be no talk about share buybacks.

AT&T is going to play the hand dealt by the federal government.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lsr+12JOZIQk

Listen to these wannabe economists talk about tax cuts for the wealthy. If the economy is so bad under Mr. Winning, give your gains to charity. You won't do that because you're just as greedy as the bankers, and wall street you're complaining about. As I'm reading this I can't help but think: are these Russian bots on this site?

Data from the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta shows that for the lowest wage earners, Trump’s “Buy American, Hire American” economy has delivered the quickest rate of wage hikes in more than a decade.

China more than doubled its purchases of U.S. soybeans between October and November, making good on the promised “goodwill” purchases during Phase 1 trade negotiations.

American companies have brought $1 trillion back to the United States since the passage of President Donald Trump’s tax cuts in 2017, according to new U.S. Department of Commerce data.

CNBC reported: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/24/global-stock-markets-gained-17-trillion-in-value-in-2019.html

Dec. 26 (UPI) — U.S. stocks surged higher Thursday as a year-end rally stoked by bullish economic news pushed the Nasdaq Composite index to 9,000 for the first time in its history.

WSJ: https://www.wsj.com/articles/employers-turn-to-on-the-job-boot-camps-to-fill-out-workforce-11577034001?mod=mhp

Notice nothing from Faux News? You whiners better buckle up, more Winning is on the way.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ccx+12JOZIQk

I don't disagree with much of your post, particularly about the flagrant lies the scumbags used to secure tax breaks, but....

Given the cost (interest rate) of the current debt, and the dividend yield that T is basically required to pay on stock (if they didn't, it would tank), it's actually cheaper to buy back the stock and not pay the dividend on each share. Sometimes paying interest in fact is cheaper than the alternative.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rwh+12JOZIQk

Post a reply

: