There is too much of a "I'm never wrong," idiocy baked into T for this to ever happen. People that think they are far more intelligent than they really are because their basis of comparison is relatively shallow. They also have been throughly sold an ideal and identify with the brand, through social conditioning, as an extension of who they are in ways not unsimilar to communties in North Korea under Kim Jong-il's rule.
This destroys collaboration, innovation and worst of all, rings of cowardice. How can one suggest to be in possesion of impeccable intelligence, yet be so blind to how impacted by cognitive dissonance they are?
These aren't condemnations (such as those continually heaped upon my brow) but rather "make it make sense" questions that implore the AI-Think trained leadership and religiously devote followers of all things T to have a godamned original thought for once that is "backed by the data" of compant rhetoric aka "weasle slinking b—s—." I mean, I know they can't but, its nice to imagine.