Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

The fiber build is over.

Been reading on here lots of comments about how we need to "keep building out fiber". They are done with the build, you don't know that?

by
| 2500 views | | 23 replies (last July 28, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+10dzSUgB

23 replies (most recent on top)

What id–ts.... Other poster is right they put fiber in areas that can’t afford it don’t want it because it was older Area easier to place with no thought process of people actually going to buy the product!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3hrc+10dzSUgB

@2psz....look at all of the linemen and splicers on the surplus list and tell me who's right you or the OP....T has said it's over and anything done going forward will be small scale specific jobs. The folks who took the additional jobs for the fiber build a few years ago were told that when the build was over(2020) that about 60% of them would be surplulsed. But hey, go ahead and downvote.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2lcl+10dzSUgB

The downvotes are the result of your id–tic low intelligence stupidity.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2psz+10dzSUgB

i don't understand downvoting a factual statement. the fiber build is done. thats a fact. downvotes???

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2tng+10dzSUgB

They ran fiber in old neighborhoods because it’s easier and cheaper to pull lines on a pole and then they can point to the low subscriber numbers to convince the investors that FTTP isn’t worth the money. Had they done a real street by street build including newer buried plant and MDU’s where younger folks live and want higher speeds the subscriber base would be higher. Of course all this means is dumbo Randall would be proven wrong on every one of his decisisons since DTV and we can’t have that now can we?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hyn+10dzSUgB

It is my understanding that in a lot of the build out areas T didn't offer the TV service, just the HSIA & Voice. That could have been a factor in the low subscription rate, that and placing fiber in front of abandoned houses.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1szi+10dzSUgB

Ever sense a " just end it for me, just shoot me please" mentality?
Got to keep the herd moving, don't worry about the front of the line....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ncw+10dzSUgB

Typical mo–n response to fiber build. We spent billions on it. Never got higher than 17% subscriber rate. Obligation to build from the direct tv merger is fulfilled. 5g can’t penetrate walls. Once deployed though, 80% of field workers will be promoted to customer

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1uoq+10dzSUgB

Keep it mind that the only reason this latest fiber roll out occurred was because it was mandated by the FCC as part of buying DTV and it turns out people want the higher speeds, according to the quarter results we lost subscribers in old slow copper speeds but gained in FTTP. Funny how that works and how T is going around proud of themselves on that result when unless forced into it they wouldn’t have even bothered with anymore fiber builds.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yic+10dzSUgB

If the stock price stays around the same they are paying out 6% on each share of stock. Not a expert on financial statements but the return on buybacks would seem to be better than what some of the business units are doing as a ROI right now. Some of those units are huge companies in their own right and takes a lot to move the needle.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kaw+10dzSUgB

In the press release for the 2Q earnings, they said they were considering repurchasing stock. So, in the competition for funding, with 5G deployment, debt pay down, fiber deployment, and repurchasing shares, it is interesting that repurchasing stock is in contention.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fed+10dzSUgB

Fiber will only be deployed where there is a payback.

Going to be interesting to see how they manage whatever the C&E workforce is in the future with those dynamics. In the past it was basically full blast until the capital budget was depleted. Have seen Core actually transfer money to that organization to provide copper rehab work when that happened if money was available. With fiber, capacity will not be as big of a issue in a lot of places. In the large metro areas there probably won’t be a problem keeping work in the pipeline. In the smaller areas it seems like 5G will be cell site based. There won’t be self driving cars in Podunk, Wyoming.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @moq+10dzSUgB

It is interesting though that I can pull up and watch my DTV without problems on my tablet, with 2-3 bars showing on my phone at home. Obviously not HD and the content is limited. Takes a few seconds initially to download but after that don’t remember any issues.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ibt+10dzSUgB

Fiber will only be deployed where there is a payback. And that's not consumers. Business fiber build out will continue as it is requested. Of course some new buildout for highband 5G buildout.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wei+10dzSUgB

Thanks Captain Obvious.... yes we all know the fiber build is “over” however many employees don’t agree with that direction

I will say though... we are still placing facilities to new construction, fiber to the business, CRAN- in support of 5G network.... I mean it’s not like 5G/Pole top antenna runs on magic

Although the large scale builds are over we will continue placing cable every day... also have to maintain facilities in place

I think the point people are trying to make is... placing fiber everywhere in an effort to provide broadband and wireless service makes more sense than only focusing on large cities and getting into content wars with Netflix. It’s obvious DirecTV was a mistake as our compounding customer losses prove each quarter

Randy should have stayed in his lane instead of trying to be the next Ted Turner/Steve Jobs

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zrz+10dzSUgB

It’s simple. Randall Stephenson was never an operations guy. He’s got no clue how to run this business because he never understood it. He’s simply an over glorified bean counter that came from the finance dept. He buys companies , because he doesn’t know how to compete. In his mind, it’s cheaper to deploy 5G than fiber. In his mind, everyone will be watching tv from 5g in their homes. Meanwhile , I haven’t been able to get more than one bar for 4g in my home but I’m supposed to believe I’ll have 5g streaming into my home ? Give me a break. They can’t even fix what we got.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @alv+10dzSUgB

we know its over .people are saying it was the wrong freaking strategy ??? helloooo

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mdc+10dzSUgB

They announced quite a while ago that the fiber build out to satisfy the government imposed requirements related to the DirectTV acquisition would complete in July, and that any further fiber deployment would be much more selective.

This is not new news folks.
https://www.fiercetelecom.com/telecom/at-t-s-donovan-says-telco-will-take-a-more-incremental-approach-to-fiber-builds

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dra+10dzSUgB

The smartchat agent is not available, please contact some one else for assistance. That is all.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bod+10dzSUgB

Cord cutters still need Internet
SMH I don’t know why this company is throwing away a good network and business!
5g is not going to penetrate every where

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @shj+10dzSUgB

AT&T s—s. Update your resumes.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qxm+10dzSUgB

I thought it was just crazy that we were doing the same thing in several different exchanges. “ There’s no way that’s going on in other areas only to find out it was”

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rmw+10dzSUgB

The email we just received about completing the fiber build was just a slap in the face to us. Having been on the line crew for the entire build that started a few years ago, we were no where near done with the fiber build and we primarily did the build in low income housing areas where no one can afford it and half of the homes are abandoned. Now I and many others are getting surplused because this fiber build was just as big sham by the company and was purposely designed to fail.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tva+10dzSUgB

Post a reply

: